Comments on: p2pnet World Headlines – June 17, 2009

By: RW-4

RW-4 — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:06:52 +0000

@RW-1, I am wondering just how realistic this proposed consumer law is. And yes, the way Telecom is going and the promise Marloise made to hold a series of referendums last week, Telecom could be used as a yes/no platform. Keep in mind that the bloc want their own CRTC. This may not be good for Quebec in the long haul on the neutrality front or copyright front. I stand divided.

@RW-2, RW-3 is correct

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:12:25 +0000

Google did, not MS (I think)

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:35:18 +0000

[i]“Canadian crackdown a first – Microsoft has filed its first-ever lawsuit over click fraud”[/i]

Didn’t this company also accuse multitudes of websites (including P2PNET) of click-fraud?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:30:07 +0000

Quebec took it into their own hands, because the federal government was not taking care of the wireless industry for years, letting them develop business models based on gouging customers.

If I see Quebec do more things right, I will vote “yes” on the next referendum to separate Quebec from Canada. After all, Canada recognized NATO-orchestrated Kosovo independence, opening the possibility that Canada itself does not have to stay as is.