<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pablo Soto: international file sharing pin-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23477/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23477</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NoOne</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23477/comment-page-1#comment-976255</link>
		<dc:creator>NoOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=23477#comment-976255</guid>
		<description>What a lie, what a propaganda! Has Pablo Soto ever sued someone for copying his stuff like the RIAA and majors behind it did? When have these majors given their stuff away for free like Soto did with his software? How did the Associated Press manage to fail to notice that the latest work of Pablo Soto, namely Omemo, is free and open source under the GNU GPL (and the website content is under a Creative Commons License)? Is it that hard to get their facts straight? Besides, when they say &quot;because Spain is ranked as one of the worldâs worst Internet piracy offenders&quot;,  hell, whose ranking is this? I do consider Spain as a country with sane laws about copyright, they happen to take into consideration the well being of their society (probably because they&#039;re not infected by lobbies as much as the US and France are). And I&#039;m fairly sure I&#039;m not the only one to think that way.

So, Associated Press or Propaganda Press?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lie, what a propaganda! Has Pablo Soto ever sued someone for copying his stuff like the RIAA and majors behind it did? When have these majors given their stuff away for free like Soto did with his software? How did the Associated Press manage to fail to notice that the latest work of Pablo Soto, namely Omemo, is free and open source under the GNU GPL (and the website content is under a Creative Commons License)? Is it that hard to get their facts straight? Besides, when they say &#8220;because Spain is ranked as one of the worldâs worst Internet piracy offenders&#8221;,  hell, whose ranking is this? I do consider Spain as a country with sane laws about copyright, they happen to take into consideration the well being of their society (probably because they&#8217;re not infected by lobbies as much as the US and France are). And I&#8217;m fairly sure I&#8217;m not the only one to think that way.</p>
<p>So, Associated Press or Propaganda Press?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23477/comment-page-1#comment-976241</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=23477#comment-976241</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s a pin-up all right -- for the RIAA&#039;s target practice.

It&#039;s a wonder why they waited so long to go after Pablo, as most of the other major P2P developers were sued in the early 2000&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s a pin-up all right &#8212; for the RIAA&#8217;s target practice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a wonder why they waited so long to go after Pablo, as most of the other major P2P developers were sued in the early 2000&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


