Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3Rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Jamie Thomas-Rasset’s $1.92 million playlist

p2pnet news view RIAA | P2P:- In the finding Jammie Thomas infringed the copyrights on 24 corporate music industry songs, and that they were each worth the absolutely ridiculous amount of $80,000 for a total of $1.92 million, here’s the play list »»»

UMG
Vanessa Williams – Save the best for last
Sheryl Crow – Run baby run
Reba McEntire – One honest heart
Janet Jackson – let’s wait awhile
Guns ‘n Roses – Welcome to the jungle
Guns ‘n Roses – November rain
Def Leppard – Pour some sugar on me
Bryan Adams – Somebody
Aerosmnith – Cryin

Warner Bros Records
Linkin Park – One step closer
Green Day – Basket case
Goo Goo Dolls – iris

Interscope Records
No Doubt – Hella Good
No Doubt – Different people
No Doubt – Bathwater

Arista Records
Sarah McLaughlan – Building a mystery
Sarah McLaughlan – Possession

Sony BMG Music Entertainment

Gloria Estefan – Rhythm is gonna get you
Gloria Estefan – Here and we are
Gloria Estefan – coming out of the dark
Journey – Faithfully
Journey – Don’t stop believin
Destiny’s child – Bills, bills, bills

Capitol Records
Richard Marx – Now and for ever

What would happen if Jammie just flat-out refuses to pay on the grounds the jury was obviously out of its collective mind or, as someone has suggested, they misheard $18,000 (which still would have been bad enough) for $80,000?

It’s just within the realms of possibility that US president Barack Obama has until now somehow missed hearing about the depredations of the largely foreign corporate music industry, only one of which can be said to be American, and then barely, against American citizens. But surely he must have heard of this.

And since he is, as he claimed to be, the champion of ordinary people, surely he’ll want to do something about it?

Jon Newton – p2pnet

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

June, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

34 Responses to “Jamie Thomas-Rasset’s $1.92 million playlist”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Bullshit.. Record labels make million and millions, it may be harder to start a band or record label now but give me a break. Those record labels don’t need to be taking all that money from one freakin’ person.

  2. Robert Says:

    @RA they know they won’t get it. The RIAA lawyers are going to negotiate a settlement, at least that’s what the news has been reporting.

    This will undoubtedly come back to bit the record labels where it hurts.

    I’m still hoping it was a clever tactic of Kiwi to do this. I really hope he has some sort of super-mega plan up his sleeve and that’s why the defense suddenly folded.

  3. Richard Says:

    Wow, and these fuckers have the sack to call her a pirate?

    When will governments see that the music is extorting people left right and centre under the thin veil of an archaic law………..and getting away with it.

    To be honest it’s a fucking outrage and I really hope that someone steps up to the plate and puts an end to the charade that the corporate pirate are getting away with.

    This is only the beginning, so if it’s not dealt with now then christ knows where it’ll end.

  4. Jon Says:

    “Here is the 1.9 Million dollar “Album” available for FREE download on Piratebay. My upload speed sucks but it’s more of a symbolic effort …”

    http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4962775/Songs_the_RIAA_can_go_fuck_themselves_to

    (Cheers and thanks, scammyguy!)

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    crackhead land. lol

  6. Richard Says:

    @Jon

    Lol, nice job mate.

  7. byteme Says:

    Of COURSE the RIAA is willing to make an offer to settle for less…that way, if Jammie goes for it, this precident will remain on the books and they can cite it to help them win other cases.

  8. Reader's Write Says:

    Here is the American Justice system

    Have lots of money = trial won
    Have little or no money = guilty

    The little guy(or person) always loses, why because that is the American way and one little person means nothing to Justice, Government and the majority of the American public.

    That is why Insurance companies can decide if you live or die in the States, They have all the money and you don’t.
    Poor Americans fight their Wars! Wars based on ensuring American Companies and Government can access more money.

    The Trial is no surprise the little guy can never win, it just isn’t American!!!!!

  9. Reader's Write Says:

    Download these songs! Burn them to all the CDs you can afford. Leave them everywhere: on the bus, on magazine stands, everywhere. Label them “The $1.92 Millian CD” and mention the Jammie Thomas trial on the label somewhere. Spread these stupid songs far and wide. Pirate the crap out of them.

  10. AndyK Says:

    This is new war !!! We will fight for her !!! Don’t buy these bands !!! Teach them …They are only thanks to us !!!

  11. RIAA Hater Says:

    Why didn’t Al Qaeda target the RIAA offices?

    This day, piracy has become stronger! Draw your swords!

  12. Maroan Says:

    To AndyK: The bands/artists mentioned here are not the guilty part of this story, the majors are. In fact, I doubt theses artists will see some of this money at all….

  13. Reader's Write Says:

    This is why record lables are losing so much money- because of how low dirty and money hungary they are, their ruining it for them selves going after comon people and you know what it opens our eyes so we can see what kind of people were really spending our money on, i hope they lose even more money now because they have just created war with the public who should be looked at customers instead of enemys. if its enemys they want then its less profit they get!

  14. Liz from Giganews Says:

    when people/industries act out of fear they do very irrational things and typically destroy what could evolve into something decent.
    seems they are choosing to win the battle rather than the war and by winning I mean getting real and figuring out a solution- respond not react.
    Maybe that’s too logical :)

  15. Jon Says:

    Hey Liz:

    ‘Logic’ isn’t favoured by the cartels. ;)

    Cheers!

  16. Jeff Says:

    Although I don’t like most of those songs on the $1.92 million playlist, I might just download
    that Pirate Bay torrent and seed the hell out of it as an act of protest.

    Of course my BitTorrent application’s (Vuze) IP filters will be enabled and active.

    On only occasion have I ever seen any persistent activity by the RIAA’s enforcers, MediaSentry
    or MediaDefender, and that was a torrent of a recent Rod Stewart release, which got pulled from
    Mininova shortly after it was posted. Maybe this one will garner similar attention by them.

  17. NO1UNO Says:

    If youre going to DL the $1.92 album, make sure you use everything you can for privacy, (PG2, tor) it might not be the best protection, but it is better than nothing!!

    stw ;)

  18. Jon Says:

    Nothing is foolproof, but actually, PG is Pretty Good.

    Cheers!

  19. Dreddsnik Says:

    Another manifest error of law ?

    One of his Jury instructions ONCE AGAIN is not rooted in any law.

    “Instruction 18

    The act of downloading sound recordings on a per to peer network Without license from the copyright holders,
    violates the copyright owners’ exclusive reproduction right. ”

    This act is allowed by the AHRA for the purpose of personal, not for profit use, that is why the RIAA no longer sues for
    downloading, they sue for distribution. Since she is being sued for distribution this does not belong here and is NOT
    an agreed on defacto LAW.

    Judge Davis’ instructions give the jury no choice but to find her guilty, if not of distribution, but of downloading, in a roundabout
    way.

    This error of law is less obvious than the one from the first trial and shows, not a desire to be just, but to still give the
    RIAA the same result in a fashion better suited to cover judges davis’ ass.

    The Judge is working in biased fashion with the well monied RIAA.

  20. Matty Says:

    I’d pay $80,000 to hear November Rain. That song kicks ass.

  21. Reader's Write Says:

    For those wanting a safe way to download Jammie’s playlist; I just checked and every song is available in the newsgroups and can downloaded safely from a provider like Giganews or Astraweb. Use a search/index site like Binsearch.info to find them. Make sure you don’t download the karaoke versions as they either don’t have the vocals, or they’ve been lowered to allow people to sing over them. There are also a few typos in the list as published here;

    “Aerosmnith” should be “Aerosmith”

    “Sarah McLaughlan” should be “Sarah McLachlan”

    “Here and we are” should be “Here we are”

    Just copy each artist and song title and paste it into Binsearch’s search box.

  22. surfer Says:

    be sure and use Giganews for all your usenet downloading.

    :)

    stw

  23. wheatus Says:

    How did it come to this?

    If any of you think this money, or however much they wind up scraping from this poor woman for the rest of her life, is gonna find it’s way into the hands of The Artists who created that material you are as ignorant as you can be.

    Now The RIAA can encourage theft of their products….this sets the precedent: getting paid 1 million times what the MP3 is worth by a Kangaroo Court is much better than having to work for it.

    The only way to fight this is to become a smarter record buyer… support Independent direct download services only.

    brendan b brown
    wheatus,com

  24. surfer Says:

    http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=63875&g2_serialNumber=3

  25. Devil's Advocate Says:

    @surfer:

    OMG! Why didn’t you put a warning on that image link?!…
    …that was friggin’ traumatic!
    8 (

  26. surfer Says:

    ‘anybody else wanna limp?’ – Eddie Murphy

  27. NO1UNO Says:

    WOW, ive never been called a WHORE till now, thanks Bruno Whoeverthefuck you think you are!!
    By the way, where can i send you the bill for the keyboard i spewed on reading your total BS!

    stw:)

  28. NO1UNO Says:

    figuring it the RIAASS way, lets see…..

    $15 keyboard X 80,000 = $1,200,000 you owe me !!!

  29. easyTree Says:

    Much as I want to show ’support’ by downloading these tunes from piratebay; I cannot, in good conscience listen to Janet Jackson (or 90% of the others). If I were wearing a tin-foil hat, I’d say that this whole charade is a last-ditch attempt to draw attention to artists who have musically died and been buried.

    Sure; nice try. Noone downloads Janet Jackson tunes. The triall should have ended at the point where the list of tunes was brought forward as evidence; with the whole court rolling about laughing.

  30. Jim Says:

    I can’t see this woman downloading this sort of music. Then again that is my opinion.
    I think the jury knows that the “fine” is excessive and the judge should disallow it for that very reason.
    This is a travesty and if it is allowed I for one will be an avid illegal down loader. riaa can take a leap at a flying doughnut hole.

  31. Adam Says:

    The way to deal with the RIAA is a total boycott of the member labels.
    Don’t download the songs. Don’t buy them. Don’t listen to them.
    Don’t even hum them.

    No loss. They’re crap anyway.

  32. nicktherat Says:

    all i can say is

    Aerosmith “Cryin’”
    Bryan Adams “Somebody”
    Def Leppard “Pour Some Sugar on Me”
    Destiny’s Child “Bills, Bills, Bills”
    Gloria Estefan “Here We Are”
    “Coming Out of the Dark”
    “Rhythm Is Gonna Get You”
    Goo Goo Dolls “Iris”
    Green Day “Basket Case”
    Guns N’ Roses “Welcome to the Jungle”;
    “November Rain”
    Janet Jackson “Let’s Wait Awhile”
    Journey “Faithfully”;
    “Don’t Stop Believing”
    Linkin Park “One Step Closer”
    No Doubt “Bathwater”
    “Hella Good”
    “Different People”
    Reba McEntire “One Honest Heart”
    Richard Marx “Now and Forever”
    Sarah McLachlan “Possession”
    “Building a Mystery”
    Sheryl Crow “Run Baby Run”
    Vanessa L. Williams “Save the Best for Last”

  33. Monkey D. Luffy Says:

    She dl’d Richard Marx!!! You gotta be shitting me. Just for that I would have fined her the 1.92 mil, not for copyright infringement but for horrendously bad taste. I’d drop the fine down to $1.00 if she agreed to delete that excrement off her hard drive.

  34. Reader's Write Says:

    Dreddsnik is absolutely right here:

    “Another manifest error of law ?
    One of his Jury instructions ONCE AGAIN is not rooted in any law.
    “Instruction 18
    The act of downloading sound recordings on a per to peer network Without license from the copyright holders,
    violates the copyright owners’ exclusive reproduction right. ”
    This act is allowed by the AHRA for the purpose of personal, not for profit use, that is why the RIAA no longer sues for
    downloading, they sue for distribution. Since she is being sued for distribution this does not belong here and is NOT
    an agreed on defacto LAW.
    Judge Davis’ instructions give the jury no choice but to find her guilty, if not of distribution, but of downloading, in a roundabout
    way.”

    This is what I think happened to Jammie at the first trial, and the SAME THING happened again, at the first trial, she admitted to copying CDs so the jury had no choice but to find her guilty so again.
    And this time she was found to have downloaded the songs, so the jury had no choice but to find her guilty.

    Here my (downsized) post about the first trial:
    Reader’s Write Says:
    January 7th, 2008 at 10:23 am
    In my opinion, whether or not she shared files or had any on a shared drive had nothing to do with the Guilty verdict.
    The Judge told the Jury that if she reproduced a copy without a lisense it was infringement . (the judge likely got this idea from Pariser’s mis-speak, taking her word for it that it was true and did not take Fair Use into consideration.)
    Jammie admitted she made copies without authorization. (quite possibly under the Fair Use provision)
    here are the instructions the Judge gave the Jury:
    http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/jury_instructions.pdf
    “JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 13
    Each plaintiff claims in this case that the defendant
    violated its exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute
    its copyrighted works. One who either reproduces or
    distributes a copyrighted work during the term of the
    copyright infringes the copyright, unless licensed by the
    copyright owner.”

    They have had the jury nail her TWICE – by instructing them incorrectly.

    Shame on you Judge Davis.

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
TekSavvy


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®