Comments on: Copyright works: toxic waste

By: Natanael L

Natanael L — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:15:27 +0000

And another thing: I guess that the “digitalization” of the television broadcasting here in Sweden mostly were for the sake of making it easier to control the market by packaging TV channels even more in the way the broadcasting companies prefer (copy-prevention, etc)…

I really don’t want to get more than one of those receivers for free television (that can take in the “govermental” SVT channels (which is surprisingly good) and TV4).

By: Natanael L

Natanael L — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:12:00 +0000

âIf it isnât copyleft, share alike, CC0, or otherwise stipulated as safe for handling by the public then donât touch it with a barge poleâ

I agree.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:07:59 +0000

Soon they will be only two type of content:

The copyrighted crap from: Vivendique-Universale//Sony-BMG/EMI/Time Warner and others RIAA/MPAA/BPI/IFPI/. . . . parasites that everyone will ignore.

and

the creative comon that will replace completly the crap from above.

Personaly I am disgusted by these pigs. They seriously got on my nerve.
I no longer buy music or movies I no longer listen to the radio I no longe go to the movie theater and I watch less an less TV.

Soon all these entertainment gangsters, spectors parasites and company will be no more than a bad dream.