<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASCAP: &#8216;You&#8217;re all pirates, but don&#8217;t fret&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23804/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23804</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:36:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SteelWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23804/comment-page-1#comment-977022</link>
		<dc:creator>SteelWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=23804#comment-977022</guid>
		<description>The reason why this bull@#$% doesn&#039;t get shot down immediately is that ASCAP, the RIAA, and all of the other Cartel Clones takes everybody on a wild ride through the spaces between the law. In arguments like this one, they&#039;re trying to say that the &quot;public performances&quot; offered by the ringtones are providing indirect financial gain to the carriers (even though it&#039;s the users who purchase and use the songs). Sadly, this gives them some wiggle-room to argue and these kinds of &quot;interpretations&quot; of the law have not yet been solidly defeated in court. Even when they have (remember &quot;making available&quot;?) these eels repackage it and keep on spinning. These games aren&#039;t going to stop until we write new laws that clearly and explicitly give rights to end users. Something like, &quot;when a song is purchased, the purchaser gains any and all rights provided there is no significant financial gain.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why this bull@#$% doesn&#8217;t get shot down immediately is that ASCAP, the RIAA, and all of the other Cartel Clones takes everybody on a wild ride through the spaces between the law. In arguments like this one, they&#8217;re trying to say that the &#8220;public performances&#8221; offered by the ringtones are providing indirect financial gain to the carriers (even though it&#8217;s the users who purchase and use the songs). Sadly, this gives them some wiggle-room to argue and these kinds of &#8220;interpretations&#8221; of the law have not yet been solidly defeated in court. Even when they have (remember &#8220;making available&#8221;?) these eels repackage it and keep on spinning. These games aren&#8217;t going to stop until we write new laws that clearly and explicitly give rights to end users. Something like, &#8220;when a song is purchased, the purchaser gains any and all rights provided there is no significant financial gain.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
