<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No MediaSentry, says Tenenbaum team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23805/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23805</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:10:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23805/comment-page-1#comment-977066</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=23805#comment-977066</guid>
		<description>The judge wil almost certainly rule it admissable, just like Judge Davis did in the Jammie Thomas trial. I think it&#039;s highly unlikely that a judge would just gut the RIAA&#039;s case based on an argument that&#039;s hardly clear-cut and which has been ruled in their favor in the past.

Personally, I think they&#039;d have a better chance of getting it suppressed by arguing the unreliability of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The judge wil almost certainly rule it admissable, just like Judge Davis did in the Jammie Thomas trial. I think it&#8217;s highly unlikely that a judge would just gut the RIAA&#8217;s case based on an argument that&#8217;s hardly clear-cut and which has been ruled in their favor in the past.</p>
<p>Personally, I think they&#8217;d have a better chance of getting it suppressed by arguing the unreliability of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23805/comment-page-1#comment-977036</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=23805#comment-977036</guid>
		<description>While I totally agree that all the MediaSentry &quot;evidence&quot; should be thrown out, Joel&#039;s team will probably need to make an iron-clad presentation on that point in order to make it happen.  The courts haven&#039;t been very cooperative on this point so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I totally agree that all the MediaSentry &#8220;evidence&#8221; should be thrown out, Joel&#8217;s team will probably need to make an iron-clad presentation on that point in order to make it happen.  The courts haven&#8217;t been very cooperative on this point so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
