Nick Brett specialises in the defence of FACT prosecutions and copyright offences. It is a tribute to both his determination and ability that he and junior counsel (acting alone) pitted against an entire team from FACT, won this case on behalf of his delighted clients at first instance.

Source: http://lewisnedas.co.uk/2009/05/high-court-judgement/
Verdict: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/958.html

Good suggestion

Surfthechannel = Suprnova on steroids
by Nonamehere – Jun 27th, 2009 @ 10:06am
Suprnova.org could never have run without the forum been there, the forum has been run by a few different people in the past, but is now in the hands of a guy called anton Vickerman (FD aka TheShadow)

This is a money driven guy, If the is no cash there, he wont be either.
Over the last few months we have seen a massive change in nova, this is due to methlabs paying slon an extreamly large amount of money to drop Bittorrent and use the mass amount of people that come to nova to promote there new p2p software to, As the forum is the heart of suprnova, everyone from the site can go there and talk to eachother, MY advice to anyone going there still is ask lots of questions,

Its a shame to see so many people sticking up for suprnova when they are unaware of what they are actually sticking up for.

It use to be a very good torrent dump site, now its a cash machine for the owners.

Its time for you guys to wise up and relise that suprnova is dead, now is the time for them to rake in as much money as possible.

I wouldnt be suprised if slon was on the run, someone did put his real home address in the irc channel (he used it when he first registerd suprnova) also i wouldnt be suprised if FD aka the shadow had something coming to him aswell as he made the same misstake when first registering his old sites, i know his real home address was even floating around as a torrent so quite a few people must have it.

So il say it again, suprnova is dead, now is the time of the money makers

by Family Friend on January 29, 2005 at 2:13 pm

http://web.archive.org/web/20070927050134/http://www.carniola.org/2004/11/hunting-slovenias-li ttle-elephant.htm

“Google gets sued all the time. Just not over music copyright infringment.”

How about this item, infringement over music videos no less:

http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/

Google gets sued all the time. Just not over music copyright infringment.

Google, Yahoo, Bing, Post Google You Tube [Money, No Lawsuits]

===== Line =====

TBP, TorrentSpy, Misc. P2P Aps, Napster [No/Little Money, Lawsuits]

Any Questions?

If someone does not realize what they are doing, the law sees them more leniently. Whether this extra leniency removes all charges or simply lowers their magnitude depends on the crime.

For example, pre-meditated murder constitutes a much greater jail sentence than giving someone a piece of rope that they use to hang themselves a year later