No worries.
This is just DA’s own personal stalker. Whatever stance DA takes, his stalker will take the opposite.
Looks like he gave up on embedding Ad links while faking DA’s name.

Make like he’s invisible.

It sounds like you’re saying that you wouldn’t mind having all of your freedoms and liberties taken away all for the sake of what would most likely amount to as a fruitless witch hunt. Yeah, that sounds like a really good idea to me. Once you’ve given up your rights, good luck getting them back. Child pornography is bad, it’s true and I won’t debate that. Since concepts such as freedom, liberty and human rights don’t seem to hold any value for you, how about we put it in more material terms that someone even as dense as you should be able to grasp. How much of your lifestyle are you willing to give away on the mere gamble that a pedophile may or may not be caught? Are you willing to give up your car? Your house? All of you belongings? How about your livelihood? Fear makes people do and say the stupidest things. You should find the documentary called “Witch Hunt” and watch it if you don’t believe me. Morons like you are why witch hunts happen in the first place. Next post you’ll be trying to justify how the government spying on everyone is perfectly ok if people have nothing to hide. Idiot.

That would never work and here’s why; If you can’t keep up with the packets in real time, you have no hope of keeping up while scanning them offline. As the devices are working through the first batch, two more batches will arrive and be buffered. As it’s scanning the second batch, two more batches will arrive. Now it’s still scanning batch #2 and it has three more waiting. While scanning batch #3, another two arrive and now you have four waiting, and so on. If it can’t scan the data in real-time, it will just keep getting more and more behind.

“I’m not talking about stuff like files guarded by copyright – the RCMP has noted that they don’t see file sharing as one of their priorities – but stuff that Canadian society deems particularly nasty, such as illicit images of naked children.

With a detailed hash-list of known illegal images/text/movies, then shouldn’t it be a relatively simple process to both limit much of the sharing of these images (when a match is detected, stop the flow of packets ‘tagged’ with that ‘fingerprint’) and notify authorities?

Law enforcement could set up an automated system that issues demands to the ISP(s) in question, and then establish procedures to gain access to subscriber information in an effort to quickly find and question those suspected of peddling kiddie porn.”

That is a spectacularly bad idea. Why? well…

Who decides what qualifies as child porn? There are many legal adult actresses who look underage, which is usually their main claim to fame. People have been mistenly arrested for having pictures and videos of them. For example; People have been arrested for having pictures of porn star Melissa-Ashley. In one case, the FBI held up one of her photos and testified that the girl in the photo was no older than 14. Even once she was identified and it was confirmed that the man had no child porn on his computer, the FBI tried to make the case that he probably THOUGHT she was underage, and so should be prosecuted as if the photos were real child porn. Not to mention that the age of consent isn’t consistant around the world.

What about mistakes? Someone looking for legal porn can easily follow a small, blurry thumbnail on a search site or one of those picture-post sites and end up on a site that the authorities have classified as child porn. Without DPI, the person would simple close that site and not go back. With DPI, they’re likely to get arrested and have their life ruined over a simple mistake. Or what if a person uses someone else’s WiFi to trade child porn? Sure, the person will probably be cleared eventually when/if a search of their hard drive, home, relatives homes, etc, all turn up negative, but by then the person will probably have lost their job, their friends and quite possibly their family. Even if they’re cleared, people will forever have doubts about them

Is catching some people who are trading these files worth all the lives it would mistakenly destroy in the process? According to what I’ve read (I wasn’t old enough to be knowledgable about porn back then), child porn wasn’t even illegal to own in the 1970s. Companies produced it, stores sold it and people bought it. I can find no evidence that child molesting was a global epidemic back then, so why is it now the 21st century’s witchhunt? Even cartoons and CGI/photoshopped images of children are being treated as child porn. It’s like anyone even suspected of having looked at child porn must be dragged into the street and burned alive.

What?! You’re not gonna throw in “terrorists” as well??
LMFAO!

Once you allow this kind of prying into the picture, you immediately throw away the idea of a WARRANT PROCESS.
EVERYONE will abuse it, and, once installed, it will be FURTHER DEVELOPED to have even more capabilities that will be abused.
As more capabilities develop, MORE SPECIAL INTERESTS will demand access to stuff that a judge would previously have refused to grant a warrant for.

We need to keep DPI away from the providers.
(We already know we can’t trust any of the major ones.)