Comments on: Deep Packet Inspection: netscapes of power http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24424 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Sukasa http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24424/comment-page-1#comment-978197 Sukasa Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:53:51 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24424#comment-978197 I use Shaw, and if they're controlling my P2P bandwidth or DPI or whatever, I don't notice it. I can still get up to the connection's rated top speed with Torrents for extended periods of time (if the torrent is active enough). I use Shaw, and if they’re controlling my P2P bandwidth or DPI or whatever, I don’t notice it. I can still get up to the connection’s rated top speed with Torrents for extended periods of time (if the torrent is active enough).

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24424/comment-page-1#comment-978179 Reader's Write Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:57:47 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24424#comment-978179 DPI is really just Deep Privacy Invasion. the communications between two IP's should be considered private, just like a phone call. the use of DPI should be banned unless it is being used as a tool for law enforcement to nail a criminal (with a warrant from a judge) I wouldn't be surprised if DPI devices were created with the above in mind. DPI is really just Deep Privacy Invasion.
the communications between two IP’s should be considered private, just like a phone call.
the use of DPI should be banned unless it is being used as a tool for law enforcement to nail a criminal (with a warrant from a judge)

I wouldn’t be surprised if DPI devices were created with the above in mind.

]]>