<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Purple vs Themselves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:11:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-978042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-978042</guid>
		<description>Cue the &quot;in Soviet Russia&quot; jokes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cue the &#8220;in Soviet Russia&#8221; jokes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-978035</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-978035</guid>
		<description>absolute epitome of corruption, am I the only one that sees this? By natural right, the &#039;intellectual property&#039; of a creator is his/hers, THEN licensed for use. To think the royalty collection agencies are suing for 3k/song (amounts of which this band will NEVER see) is absolute insanity, am I crazy?

&#039;You cant play your won music unless you pay us our cut&#039; .. 
this is what copyright has become, pure extortionist outright greed, laughable, and proudly disrespected.

&#039;We are still looking for the morons who designed the copyright laws.&#039;
they should be tortured, waterboarded, sodomized, drawn and quartered, tortured some more, did I say sodomized?

stw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolute epitome of corruption, am I the only one that sees this? By natural right, the &#8216;intellectual property&#8217; of a creator is his/hers, THEN licensed for use. To think the royalty collection agencies are suing for 3k/song (amounts of which this band will NEVER see) is absolute insanity, am I crazy?</p>
<p>&#8216;You cant play your won music unless you pay us our cut&#8217; ..<br />
this is what copyright has become, pure extortionist outright greed, laughable, and proudly disrespected.</p>
<p>&#8216;We are still looking for the morons who designed the copyright laws.&#8217;<br />
they should be tortured, waterboarded, sodomized, drawn and quartered, tortured some more, did I say sodomized?</p>
<p>stw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-977923</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-977923</guid>
		<description>&quot;performance rights&quot; organizations are the classic &quot;protection racket&quot;

What more proof that if you get a PRO (ASACP, SOCAN, GEMA, NGO...) license you have no idea what songs are licensed as no catalog is given with the license. 
What can be performed is just a guessing game... or the licensee is paying simply to avoid a lawsuit from the licensing PRO... a wate of money because if the performed song is &quot;independent&quot; (not assigned to a PRO) the lawsuit can still follow.

We are still looking for the morons who designed the copyright laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;performance rights&#8221; organizations are the classic &#8220;protection racket&#8221;</p>
<p>What more proof that if you get a PRO (ASACP, SOCAN, GEMA, NGO&#8230;) license you have no idea what songs are licensed as no catalog is given with the license.<br />
What can be performed is just a guessing game&#8230; or the licensee is paying simply to avoid a lawsuit from the licensing PRO&#8230; a wate of money because if the performed song is &#8220;independent&#8221; (not assigned to a PRO) the lawsuit can still follow.</p>
<p>We are still looking for the morons who designed the copyright laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Emrich</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-977909</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Emrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-977909</guid>
		<description>Heh -- y&#039;know, I actually used to think the term &quot;MAFIAA&quot; was  an exaggeration, but nowadays, not so much:

  1. The p2p lawsuits are nothing but the classic &quot;shakedown&quot; -- give &#039;em the money, or they fuck you up.

  2. The &quot;performance rights&quot; organizations are the classic &quot;protection racket&quot;: offer to &quot;protect&quot; somebody from a bad outcome for a fee, and if they decline, make the bad outcome happen.  The Regular Mafia would often deliberately start bar-fights to demonstrate how bar owners were &quot;at risk&quot; for vandalism and bar-fights, and if the guy didn&#039;t put up the money, they&#039;d smash up the place.

   Yeah, MAFIAA is a great description of the existing &quot;industry&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh &#8212; y&#8217;know, I actually used to think the term &#8220;MAFIAA&#8221; was  an exaggeration, but nowadays, not so much:</p>
<p>  1. The p2p lawsuits are nothing but the classic &#8220;shakedown&#8221; &#8212; give &#8216;em the money, or they fuck you up.</p>
<p>  2. The &#8220;performance rights&#8221; organizations are the classic &#8220;protection racket&#8221;: offer to &#8220;protect&#8221; somebody from a bad outcome for a fee, and if they decline, make the bad outcome happen.  The Regular Mafia would often deliberately start bar-fights to demonstrate how bar owners were &#8220;at risk&#8221; for vandalism and bar-fights, and if the guy didn&#8217;t put up the money, they&#8217;d smash up the place.</p>
<p>   Yeah, MAFIAA is a great description of the existing &#8220;industry&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vato</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-977900</link>
		<dc:creator>vato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-977900</guid>
		<description>Really suspicious. collecting agencies indeed have to collect your public play royalties, but you must get registered to the collecting agency first, then they get a percentage of your money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really suspicious. collecting agencies indeed have to collect your public play royalties, but you must get registered to the collecting agency first, then they get a percentage of your money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maroan</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-977891</link>
		<dc:creator>Maroan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-977891</guid>
		<description>Lol Kafka hasnt written in vain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol Kafka hasnt written in vain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-977884</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-977884</guid>
		<description>its all about the Benjamins?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its all about the Benjamins?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewilmerx</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-977881</link>
		<dc:creator>thewilmerx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-977881</guid>
		<description>artists have to get a license to perform their own songs to make sure they get paid that their songs are being performed? hmmm sounds more like the collection agencies are trying to find new ways to get money themselves..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>artists have to get a license to perform their own songs to make sure they get paid that their songs are being performed? hmmm sounds more like the collection agencies are trying to find new ways to get money themselves..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24427/comment-page-1#comment-977879</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24427#comment-977879</guid>
		<description>So, does this mean that Deep Purple will have to appear as both defendents and plaintiffs in some future trial??
LMAO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, does this mean that Deep Purple will have to appear as both defendents and plaintiffs in some future trial??<br />
LMAO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
