Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
Teksavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Google eliminates ‘experimental feature’

p2pnet news view | Advertising:- Readers’ Writes is one of p2pnet’s most popular features.

Under it, people leave comment posts, anonymously or otherwise. But when Net adverting company Goggle tried to launch something similar, it didn’t work.

Now, “Google has eliminated an experimental feature that allowed people quoted in articles in Google News to post comments on those articles,” says the New York Times, going on »»»

People in the news media were intrigued by the idea of giving article subjects the power to comment, and the idea drew considerable coverage. But the feature never got a lot of use – the company declined to provide numbers – and it was dropped without an announcement in May.

The post ends with a Gargle dissemblement, to wit:

“We`re always experimenting with ways to make Google News more useful. Occasionally, this means we have to re-evaluate our efforts to be sure we focus on features that make the most sense for our users.”

Provide your own translation. ;)

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

New York Times – Google Drops News Comment Feature, July 1, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

2 Responses to “Google eliminates ‘experimental feature’”

  1. Maroan Says:

    In clear no way to monetise it?? ;-)

  2. EE Says:

    Sounds like it just didn’t have any realistic appeal. Why go through google when there are so many better ways to get your viewpoint across? How does commenting on google beat your own blog, an interview with a respected journalist (for PR purposes of course), or the myriad of other ways to get your voice across? If you’re already a player in the article, you have your choice of pulpits.

Leave a Reply

Please no spam, attacking others, trolling, posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Sponsored by