<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: sex.xxx in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:08:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-980036</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-980036</guid>
		<description>.xxx wont work. People have been trying (and failing) to define pornography forever basically, usually ending up with the &quot;I&#039;d know it when I see it&quot; remark. What&#039;s more is that the accepted &quot;decency&quot; level isn&#039;t static, over both time and regions.

For example I was watching TV in the UK yesterday and the film showed a woman&#039;s breasts, it was around 3pm in the afternoon. In other countries this would end up getting the TV station a huge fine. How on earth would people be able to make a decision on what belongs segregated when there&#039;s so many different opionions on what constitutes explicit content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.xxx wont work. People have been trying (and failing) to define pornography forever basically, usually ending up with the &#8220;I&#8217;d know it when I see it&#8221; remark. What&#8217;s more is that the accepted &#8220;decency&#8221; level isn&#8217;t static, over both time and regions.</p>
<p>For example I was watching TV in the UK yesterday and the film showed a woman&#8217;s breasts, it was around 3pm in the afternoon. In other countries this would end up getting the TV station a huge fine. How on earth would people be able to make a decision on what belongs segregated when there&#8217;s so many different opionions on what constitutes explicit content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978442</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978442</guid>
		<description>&quot; *shudder* What a puritanical fascist parent you are, Dreddsnik.

There is nothing wrong with porn. &quot;

 Right, as long as your 18 or over, and using a computer that I don&#039;t have
 to fix. 
 I said nothing about wiping it off the net.
 I said nothing about telling others that want to view it that they can&#039;t because
 &#039; I said so&#039;.

 That was my choice and responsibility to make as a parent to my own kids.
 I never even said the you couldn&#039;t allow your own kids to view it if it doesn&#039;t
 bother you.

 Take it in context with the rest of the article and my post.

 Parental responsibility, not the government, nor anyone elses.
 If you feel you have to relegate that responsibility to a government agency,
 don&#039;t have kids.

 That was my point.
 I&#039;ll choose for my kids, you choose for yours, and we will both be happy.
 ( I have a feeling i&#039;ll be happier than you in the long run though ) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; *shudder* What a puritanical fascist parent you are, Dreddsnik.</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with porn. &#8221;</p>
<p> Right, as long as your 18 or over, and using a computer that I don&#8217;t have<br />
 to fix.<br />
 I said nothing about wiping it off the net.<br />
 I said nothing about telling others that want to view it that they can&#8217;t because<br />
 &#8216; I said so&#8217;.</p>
<p> That was my choice and responsibility to make as a parent to my own kids.<br />
 I never even said the you couldn&#8217;t allow your own kids to view it if it doesn&#8217;t<br />
 bother you.</p>
<p> Take it in context with the rest of the article and my post.</p>
<p> Parental responsibility, not the government, nor anyone elses.<br />
 If you feel you have to relegate that responsibility to a government agency,<br />
 don&#8217;t have kids.</p>
<p> That was my point.<br />
 I&#8217;ll choose for my kids, you choose for yours, and we will both be happy.<br />
 ( I have a feeling i&#8217;ll be happier than you in the long run though ) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBH</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978388</link>
		<dc:creator>HBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978388</guid>
		<description>*shudder* What a puritanical fascist parent you are, Dreddsnik.

There is nothing wrong with porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*shudder* What a puritanical fascist parent you are, Dreddsnik.</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978279</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978279</guid>
		<description>( ps . .. their nickname for me was Pai Mei ;)  )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>( ps . .. their nickname for me was Pai Mei <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978278</guid>
		<description>&quot; even though the internet is about openness, parents and guardians should have the ability to control what their children become exposed too in a open easy to use fashion. &quot;

 They already have that ability, always have.
 It&#039;s called parental responsibility.

 I have twins, they are now 18.
 They have had net access since they were little.
 They knew I could, and would, check on them.
 I didn&#039;t need to be looking over their shoulder, all it took/takes is a 
 little education to know how to check, and where to check, and ground rules.

 1. I will check where you&#039;ve been, if you go where you shouldn&#039;t .. you get cut off.
 2. If you cover your tracks so I can&#039;t check, you get cut off.
 3. Your MySpace/facebook/etc profiles are to be private and passworded, I am to have
     that password. I will be informed of everyone you add, I will check.
 4. Change the password, you get cut off.

 I caught them .. once .. surfing porn sites. I cut them off for a month and ...
 I have a good friend who has a farm, and raises cattle. They spent a month
 going over there, shoveling cow manure for my bud. I told them if they want to
 look at shit, they may as well shovel it.

 They never broke the rules again.

 Yes, I am sure they may have put one over on me a few times, but it&#039;s a 
 kids nature to be curious, and a PARENTS responsibility to be diligent. Not 
 the government or any other special interest group. 

 Parents already have the ability, but many don&#039;t want to take the responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; even though the internet is about openness, parents and guardians should have the ability to control what their children become exposed too in a open easy to use fashion. &#8221;</p>
<p> They already have that ability, always have.<br />
 It&#8217;s called parental responsibility.</p>
<p> I have twins, they are now 18.<br />
 They have had net access since they were little.<br />
 They knew I could, and would, check on them.<br />
 I didn&#8217;t need to be looking over their shoulder, all it took/takes is a<br />
 little education to know how to check, and where to check, and ground rules.</p>
<p> 1. I will check where you&#8217;ve been, if you go where you shouldn&#8217;t .. you get cut off.<br />
 2. If you cover your tracks so I can&#8217;t check, you get cut off.<br />
 3. Your MySpace/facebook/etc profiles are to be private and passworded, I am to have<br />
     that password. I will be informed of everyone you add, I will check.<br />
 4. Change the password, you get cut off.</p>
<p> I caught them .. once .. surfing porn sites. I cut them off for a month and &#8230;<br />
 I have a good friend who has a farm, and raises cattle. They spent a month<br />
 going over there, shoveling cow manure for my bud. I told them if they want to<br />
 look at shit, they may as well shovel it.</p>
<p> They never broke the rules again.</p>
<p> Yes, I am sure they may have put one over on me a few times, but it&#8217;s a<br />
 kids nature to be curious, and a PARENTS responsibility to be diligent. Not<br />
 the government or any other special interest group. </p>
<p> Parents already have the ability, but many don&#8217;t want to take the responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978201</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978201</guid>
		<description>.xxx makes sense.
but for it to work the adult industries need to be using it.
it will help parents block the content in an easier way.

the only issue with this move would be censorship at the government or ISP (aka Idiotic Service Provider) levels.

even though the internet is about openness, parents and guardians should have the ability to control what their children become exposed too in a open easy to use fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.xxx makes sense.<br />
but for it to work the adult industries need to be using it.<br />
it will help parents block the content in an easier way.</p>
<p>the only issue with this move would be censorship at the government or ISP (aka Idiotic Service Provider) levels.</p>
<p>even though the internet is about openness, parents and guardians should have the ability to control what their children become exposed too in a open easy to use fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Λ</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978188</link>
		<dc:creator>Λ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978188</guid>
		<description>@RW: Sexism? :P 

Actually &#039;contentism&#039; is a more appropriate term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RW: Sexism? <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Actually &#8216;contentism&#8217; is a more appropriate term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978186</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978186</guid>
		<description>Racism starts with segregation too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Racism starts with segregation too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteelWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24583/comment-page-1#comment-978180</link>
		<dc:creator>SteelWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24583#comment-978180</guid>
		<description>Just what we need, more blacklisting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what we need, more blacklisting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
