<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google China censors news</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2467</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company news games video games game consoles security marketing DRM Internet radio web radio</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2467#comment-5563</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2467#comment-5563</guid>
		<description>China has the highest rate of software piracy as well, they almost encourage it through lack of enforcement....kinda being subversive to the Western Imperialists ;) - or so it has been theorized

so that's no real big surprise.

TT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has the highest rate of software piracy as well, they almost encourage it through lack of enforcement&#8230;.kinda being subversive to the Western Imperialists <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> - or so it has been theorized</p>
<p>so that&#8217;s no real big surprise.</p>
<p>TT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2467#comment-5561</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2467#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>It's funny how China gets called 'repressive'. China does not have the draconian copyright enforcement policies under which P2P users suffer here in the USA. 

Since the USA is providing free proxy servers so that Chinese internet users can skirt Chinese law, maybe China could in turn provide free proxies so US P2P users can skirt US law. That would be a fair trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how China gets called &#8216;repressive&#8217;. China does not have the draconian copyright enforcement policies under which P2P users suffer here in the USA. </p>
<p>Since the USA is providing free proxy servers so that Chinese internet users can skirt Chinese law, maybe China could in turn provide free proxies so US P2P users can skirt US law. That would be a fair trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
