<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CIPPIC net neutrality on Twitter: Day V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24816/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24816</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24816/comment-page-1#comment-978654</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24816#comment-978654</guid>
		<description>(traffice = traffic)
DOH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(traffice = traffic)<br />
DOH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/24816/comment-page-1#comment-978653</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=24816#comment-978653</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s me, but I get the impression Telus is setting the stage for future &quot;compliance&quot; with Bell&#039;s ways.

Though they&#039;ve said certain things that suggest they&#039;re more against traffice management and more in favour of network upgrade, they seemed to engineer their presentation so as not to conflict with the know views of Bell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s me, but I get the impression Telus is setting the stage for future &#8220;compliance&#8221; with Bell&#8217;s ways.</p>
<p>Though they&#8217;ve said certain things that suggest they&#8217;re more against traffice management and more in favour of network upgrade, they seemed to engineer their presentation so as not to conflict with the know views of Bell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
