Sometimes I get nailed also. I was figuring it was repetitive caps, but doesn’t seem to be. (caps, ie CRTC repeated a few times).

I think there is a word or two that akismet has learned over time to equate with spam. But try finding it…

NP, IP. It pisses me off just as much as you, and anyone else whose comments get hung up. I’ll try and figure it out. But right now, I have no clue why it rejects some and passes others. It often doesn’t like Henry, surfer or Crosbie either Cheers!

And how exactly would they know? They would need to look inside every single packet of every single customer.

The way the CRTC seems to simply accept that there really is network congestion without any proof other than Bell’s word (which nobody else, least of all the public, gets to examine for themselves) is really irksome, especially when there is plenty of contradictory proof showing the opposite is true. As long as the CRTC keeps believing that there is congestion on nothing more than blind faithh, these hearings won’t turn out so good for Canadians or wholesale customers as far as net neutrality is concerned despite the many excellent presentations.

The other thing I’m finding irksome is how the CRTC doesn’t want to address the potential abuse the WILL arise from DPI (Deep Privacy Invasion!). Again the CRTC seems to prefer taking an ISP’s word, like Bell’s, that they would never abuse DPI on nothing more than blind faith. If the CRTC legitimizes DPI, we will have to hope that they at least see the wisdom in creating iron clad laws governing it’s use and that any abuse will be dealt with harshly. If they don’t, they will be in for more hearings in the future and may eventually have to admit that they were wrong. It will be interesting to see if they really are that naive by leaving it all to chance and the empty promises of greedy corporations. If there is one thing you can always count on, it is the darker side of human nature. Mark my words, I guarantee you that DPI will be abused every which way possible down the road if it is allowed to continue running roughshod over paying customers.

(IP – For reasons I don’t understand and can’t control, Akismet has taken to flagging some stories as spam. I try to unspam them as quickly as I can, but I’m only one guy and I can’t react to everything instantly. Sorry. Cheers! – Jon.)

And how exactly would they know? They would need to look inside every single packet of every single customer.