<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA ordered to reveal financial stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25127/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25127</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:00:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rabbit80</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25127/comment-page-1#comment-979039</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbit80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25127#comment-979039</guid>
		<description>So - is the plan to show that Tenembaum&#039;s downloading had zero impact on the Big 4&#039;s revenue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8211; is the plan to show that Tenembaum&#8217;s downloading had zero impact on the Big 4&#8217;s revenue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25127/comment-page-1#comment-979006</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25127#comment-979006</guid>
		<description>@ Fausty:

You&#039;re correct. I posted this too quickly without reading it properly.

Dumb mistake.

Fixed, and thanks for pointing that out.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Fausty:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct. I posted this too quickly without reading it properly.</p>
<p>Dumb mistake.</p>
<p>Fixed, and thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fausty</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25127/comment-page-1#comment-979000</link>
		<dc:creator>Fausty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25127#comment-979000</guid>
		<description>Actually my read is that the revenue numbers from the &quot;big 4&quot; WILL be visible (and not covered by the protective order) - it&#039;s only the data from &quot;third-party artist-owned companies&quot; that classified as confidential and is subject to the Order. Anyway, that&#039;s my &quot;been out of law school for too long to remember&quot; reading of the language of the order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually my read is that the revenue numbers from the &#8220;big 4&#8243; WILL be visible (and not covered by the protective order) &#8211; it&#8217;s only the data from &#8220;third-party artist-owned companies&#8221; that classified as confidential and is subject to the Order. Anyway, that&#8217;s my &#8220;been out of law school for too long to remember&#8221; reading of the language of the order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IratePirate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25127/comment-page-1#comment-978997</link>
		<dc:creator>IratePirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25127#comment-978997</guid>
		<description>I think this shows that the industry knows the kind of sh*t storm they will find themselves in should any of their deep dark secrets ever come to light, not just from the general public but also from those they have contracts with. That is of course if I understood all of that legaleeze correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this shows that the industry knows the kind of sh*t storm they will find themselves in should any of their deep dark secrets ever come to light, not just from the general public but also from those they have contracts with. That is of course if I understood all of that legaleeze correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
