Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

13 Responses to “Cartel-proof P2P indexing site”

1. carlos Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

   google is what you are saying

   but google does not host torrents or trackers it points to other sites that do like piratebay or even mininova (torrents only)

   without the torrents and the trackers on other sites google is completely useless

   google is a bad torrent site really and not worth work to shut down

2. Reader's Write Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

   “…but google does not host torrents…”

   Yeah, but, wasn’t that the whole point?!
   Here we have the MAFIAA going after INDEXING SITES (who also don’t host torrents), while Google demonstrates itself as a prime resource to find the same torrents. This, naturally, raises the question of why Google is not targetted right along with the indexing sites.

   I have often used Google to find torrents from not only tracker sites, but a number of different sources – some of which actually fail to turn up in a standard tracker search. So far, Google has not let me down even once on a difficult find. From my experience, I find this argument extremely valid.

3. Reader's Write Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

   “…but google does not host torrents…”

   Google cache + .torrent filetype search = storred torrent on google?
   (Going to have to try that, cache works for many other features)

   Also torrents themselves are just links to trackers, which links to other computers. Lawsuits over links-to-links-to-links (with possibly more -to-links depending on the starting site)

4. carlos Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

   “Here we have the MAFIAA going after INDEXING SITES (who also don’t host torrents)”

   what do they do if they don’t host torrents? indexing sites host torrents that is what they do.

   on the other hand metasearch sites dont host torrents (like torrentz.com) so maybe this is what you mean

   and btw no metasearch sites is being sued

   like google isn’t also

5. Yeh But Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

   Yeh carlos but “*I have often used Google to find torrents from not only tracker sites, but a number of different sources – some of which actually fail to turn up in a standard tracker search. So far, Google has not let me down even once* from RW above. You have to think that would get the labels and Hollydud going.

6. Reader's Write Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

   Basically the corporate Mafia of parasites with all the monies they stole from the artists and the public control our governments and our justice systems.

   So justice is dead.

   We now can eradicate these corporate parasites.

7. Reader's Write Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

   “…but google does not host torrents…”

   But torrents are not copyrighted and if they were they will not be the “property” of the Mafia. So what is the difference between a google link and a torrent?

   NONE!

8. Reader's Write Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

   “But torrents are not copyrighted and if they were they will not be the “property” of the Mafia. So what is the difference between a google link and a torrent?”

   oh, oh, I know the answer!

   It’s what big money wants you to see. it’s all in perception (an illusion) with their branding and their marketing hoopla.

   Money talks.

   Of course there is no difference.

   each one is a link.

   It’s all the same.

   Also, keep in mind the kartels get money from google and signed big money into google utube.

   Money to the playing dumb (who wants money badly) cast this illusion.

   Did I pass?

9. Reader's Write Says:
   July 29th, 2009 at 8:51 pm

   @Carlos…

   “Indexing” sites do NOT host torrents, they merely index where they can be found.

10. ryo-oh-ki Says:
    July 30th, 2009 at 3:00 am

    Every .torrent-file is under copyright of his creator not under copyright of indexed-by-torrent files owner.

11. Reader's Write Says:
    July 30th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    ““Indexing” sites do NOT host torrents, they merely index where they can be found.”

    But torrents just merely index where content can be found also.

    So a torrent file is nothing more than an index pointing to a content somewhere on the net.

    A torrent file is not a content.

    There is no difference between an URL and a torrent. It is the same thing in a different format.

12. Irate Pirate Says:
    July 31st, 2009 at 3:18 am

    “There is no difference between an URL and a torrent. It is the same thing in a different format.”

    Don’t forget that you can right click a URL and save it as a file, which only serves to reinforce your point.

    I’m glad this article got posted. I made a comment on Torrent Freak this past week stating something along the same lines. I have Google to thank for more than half of the stuff I’ve “sampled” over the past couple of months. Google is actually better in some regards because it is not limited to torrents alone. Anyways, if an indexing site that neither hosts torrents nor does any tracking is good enough to be a legal target, then so should all the other search engines out there (Google, Yahoo, Altavista, Bing, etc). I’d really love to see the entertainment industry go up against any one of them for a laugh or two.

13. i don't like logs. Says:
    November 1st, 2009 at 10:09 am

    just go anonymous and say fk em. use a vpn.

Leave a Reply