<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .xxx sex and Erin Andrews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25796/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25796</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EmuWikiAdmin</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25796/comment-page-1#comment-980073</link>
		<dc:creator>EmuWikiAdmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25796#comment-980073</guid>
		<description>This is a scandal, I thought people were actually interested in P2P technology!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a scandal, I thought people were actually interested in P2P technology!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25796/comment-page-1#comment-980054</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25796#comment-980054</guid>
		<description>Are these hits coming from Google searches? It seems that the last time P2Pnet went on a bottom-feeding kick a lot of regular readers were turned off. Stuffing the pages with &#039;naked celebrity of the day&#039; stories might draw in plenty of readers, but there&#039;s obviously a limit. Otherwise, Sports Illustrated might have reverted to publishing swimsuit pictures full-time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these hits coming from Google searches? It seems that the last time P2Pnet went on a bottom-feeding kick a lot of regular readers were turned off. Stuffing the pages with &#8216;naked celebrity of the day&#8217; stories might draw in plenty of readers, but there&#8217;s obviously a limit. Otherwise, Sports Illustrated might have reverted to publishing swimsuit pictures full-time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Reimer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25796/comment-page-1#comment-980042</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Reimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25796#comment-980042</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s nothing. Back on my old blog, i went by 2-3 months after starting with low traffic (3-4k/month unique). After i posted a story about a girl who was charged with distributing child porn (pictures of herself naked), i started seeing 30-35k/month, mainly on that article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nothing. Back on my old blog, i went by 2-3 months after starting with low traffic (3-4k/month unique). After i posted a story about a girl who was charged with distributing child porn (pictures of herself naked), i started seeing 30-35k/month, mainly on that article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25796/comment-page-1#comment-980034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=25796#comment-980034</guid>
		<description>Jeez! Look at it go!

Maybe I&#039;d do better to start a porn site, sell ads and get rich !!

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez! Look at it go!</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;d do better to start a porn site, sell ads and get rich !!</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


