Comments on: Google gobbles up ON2 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/26398 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/26398/comment-page-1#comment-980847 Reader's Write Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:09:29 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=26398#comment-980847 On the other hand, keep in mind that Flash's un-indexable nature is a threat to their entire business model (something they drew attention to by focusing on Chrome's high-performance JS engine), so stopping it from being "the ubiquitous alternative for rich content" could be their main goal here. To do that, they need to make Flash's competitive advantages ubiquitous: - A fast JS engine and HTML renderer in every browser (Chrome and its competitive pressure) - Efficient video compression (On2 Acquisition) - In-browser 3D (O3D) On the other hand, keep in mind that Flash’s un-indexable nature is a threat to their entire business model (something they drew attention to by focusing on Chrome’s high-performance JS engine), so stopping it from being “the ubiquitous alternative for rich content” could be their main goal here.

To do that, they need to make Flash’s competitive advantages ubiquitous:
- A fast JS engine and HTML renderer in every browser (Chrome and its competitive pressure)
- Efficient video compression (On2 Acquisition)
- In-browser 3D (O3D)

]]>