Vanessa Hudgens naked again. Again.
p2pnet news | TV:- It can’t be. Not again.
But it is.
A couple of years ago pix of Disney starlet Vanessa Hudgens, nekked as a jaybird, hit the net.
Up until then, only a few teenyboppers knew who she was. But the nude photographs catapulted her to instant worldwide fame — to the benefit of Disney.
Now, “With another batch of racy pics of the 20-year-old High School Musical star hitting the web today, Ms. Hudgens finds herself facing Nudie Controversy 2.0,” says E! Online, going on:
“While her camp is staying mum, sources confirm to me that it’s definitely Hudgens in the pics.”
But they were, “apparently taken before her first naked photo controversy erupted nearly two years ago,” says the story.
“She hasn’t done anything like that since the first ones came out. These new ones are actually old.”
Oh.
The pic on the left is from the first exposure.
Also see Vanessa Hudgens as a naked hooker.
No need to stay tuned.
nekked as a jaybird – Vanessa Hudgens: naked again, September 21, 2007
E! Online – Hudgens: The Real Story on Latest Nude Pics, August 5, 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
August 7th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Why do you post a story about a celebrity having nude photos on the internet and even post censored versions of the photos, but when someone posts a comment with advice of where to find the uncensored versions, you delete it? I didn’t even post a link, just the name of the web site.
Is it because I argued with you over Google Street View that more and more of my comments seem to disappear without a trace lately?
August 7th, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Actually, I thought it was the site itself trying for free advertising. I get a lot of that.
Otherwise, since you posted as RW, how would I know you argued with me over Street View, or anything else?
Cheers!
August 7th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
This is just a warm up. She is just getting started
http://www.imdb.com/news/ni0874472/
August 8th, 2009 at 4:12 pm
“Actually, I thought it was the site itself trying for free advertising. I get a lot of that.”
Ok.
“Otherwise, since you posted as RW, how would I know you argued with me over Street View, or anything else?”
IP addresses?
Apparently the images have been removed from the site I mentioned, and the other celeb sites I tried, so people are going to have to hunt for them.
August 9th, 2009 at 12:59 am
they don’t take long to find.
In responce to question:
“Reader’s Write Says:
August 7th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Why do you post a story about a celebrity having nude photos on the internet and even post censored versions of the photos, but when someone posts a comment with advice of where to find the uncensored versions, you delete it? I didnât even post a link, just the name of the web site.”
PerezHilton.com was forced to remove the pictures due to supena/possibly court, I’m not sure. Visit the model follower (no not the chick) PerezHllton.com I think it is and look for the pics, it tells about this. The pics are still aval, elsewhere though.
August 10th, 2009 at 7:47 am
@ “IP addresses?”
I don’t collect user info.
Cheers!
August 11th, 2009 at 2:52 am
i hink this bull shit
August 11th, 2009 at 2:55 am
she should be able to do shit with out ass hole reporters fallowing her every were she goes