Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

‘What’s wrong with trusting Google?’

p2pnet news viewKids & Kartels:- For us, foxes being given free range in hen houses always comes to mind when we think of Internet ad company Google and user privacy.

With that in mind, there’s and interesting request in Slashdot from someone who says s/he provides IT services for medium-sized medical and law practices.

“Lately I have been getting a lot of feedback from doctors and lawyers who use gmail at home and believe that they can run a significant portion of their practice IT on Google Apps,” says an anonymous poster, going on »»»

From a support standpoint, I’d be happy to chuck mail/calendar service management into the bin and let them run with gmail, but for these businesses, there is significant legal liability associated with the confidentiality of their communications and records (e.g., HIPAA). For those with high-profile celebrity clients, simply telling them ‘Google employees can read your stuff’ will usually end the conversation right there.

But for smaller practices, I often get a lot of push-back in the form of ‘What’s wrong with trusting Google?’ and ‘Google’s not interested in our email/calendar.’

Weighing what they see as a tiny legal risk against the promise of Free IT Stuff(TM) becomes increasingly lopsided given the clear functionality / usability / ubiquity that they experience when using Google at home. So my question to the Slashdot community is:

Are they right? Is it time for me to remove the Tin Foil Hat on the subject of confidentiality and stop resisting the juggernaut that is Google? If not, what is the best way to clarify the confidentiality issues for these clients?”

Coincidentally, we home-school our daughter, Emma, and she and a lot of her friends hang out on a purpose-built  site carefully monitored to make sure nothing nasty gets in, and that user privacy is protected.

The people who run the site believe Google is God’s gift to us all and are currently seriously thinking about using Google apps to reconfigure it, basing the entire site on Google ‘technology’.

So, should the folks who run the home-school site similarly stop resisting the juggernaut that’s Google? Should they trust it and let it loose in this small online community where kids to some extent develop standards they’ll take with them into adulthood?

Or should they avoid it like the plague?

JN

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

SlashdotCan We Abandon Confidentiality For Google Apps?, August 4, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

4 Responses to “‘What’s wrong with trusting Google?’”

  1. Aza's Ghost Says:

    I recently was told by my Chiropractor’s assistant that they were using Google Calendar to coordinate appointments between two locations and to provide remote access to that schedule. I pointed out to them that Google Apps, while easy/convenient/free, might not be as secure or private as they believe. Of course, I was wearing my tin-foil hat at the time…

  2. Christopher Parsons Says:

    When Google:
    (a) develops a real privacy policy (they don’t really anonymize IP addresses with search in any real way);
    (b) clearly opens up their security system and guarantees encryption at rest
    (c) develops a real tech-support line that extends beyond just 24hr email (which isn’t always quick to respond to complaints)
    then I might consider them for my own stuff, but not until then.

  3. Jon Says:

    @ Chris:

    “(a) develops a real privacy policy” … which explains in explicit and painful detail exactly what they don’t, and won’t do with data they collect; and, which explains precisely what data they collect in equally painful detail …

    And even then, I’d still think twice ;)

    Cheers!

  4. NO1UNO Says:

    What’s wrong with trusting Googone? (i will not spell the name correctly)

    Lets see…..would you allow a known pedo to pick up your kid(s) from school?
    Would you drive a car that you know has absolutely no brakes?

    I could go one and list a bunch of utterly stupid acts to compare to trusting
    Goober, but i think you can get my point. They have one REAL agenda, to grab
    all the money they can by using YOUR personal data to make THEM money!!
    Dont buy into their BS about how they care about users of their “services”!
    They care about nothing but the money YOU can put in their pockets.
    Nothing more, and nothing less. I think I’d rather swim with sharks!!

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®