Flooding on p2p networks
p2pnet.net News:- Fakes, or spoofs, as the major studios and record labels like to call phony files posted on p2p networks to overpower them, have been around for a while but recently, they’ve started to appear in increasing numbers.
That’s because one of the entertainment industry’s current pet theories is: flood p2p networks with fake files and users won’t be able to tell the difference. So they’ll give up trying to download and/or share.
We knew there were plenty of Shrek 2 flood-files out there so we thought we’d see what was happening on WinMX and K-Lite (yep - it’s still around) with the latest DreamWorks production - Shark Tale.
It was interesting. There were tons of supposed downloads for both so we grabbed six Whois results randomly from the awesome list of WinMX results. See below for the list.
Although there are various ways to sort the wheat from the chaff, obvious User Name patterns being but one, there are hundreds, and possibly thousands, of spurious Shark Tales out there - certainly more than for The Forgotten or Ladder 49, two other new releases which are on the p2p nets.
Is Loudeye’s Overpeer responsible for the Shark fakes, as it is for the Shrek 2 phonies?
Could be.
One of the Hot Topics at the Digital Hollywood conference at the end of September was flooding
Questioned by people such as StreamCast Networks ceo Mike Weiss, Marc Morgenstern, vp and general manager of Overpeer, “whose technology helps protect record labels’ copyrights,” danced around the issue of whether or not Overper is flooding p2p networks, although, as we said earlier, there’s no doubt that it is.
Ratiatum.com has a list of 2,989 files distributed by the company, including 789 spoofs of Shrek 2.
But, “This is a discreet activity authorized by the content owners,” Morgenstern said. “We’re engaged in legal activity.”
There is, however, nothing disceet about it.
At this point, fake music and movie files exist in their thousands - perhaps hundreds of thousands.
But the entertainment industry deals in extremes, Big Music’s sue ‘em all campaign against people who share music and the Motion Picture Association’s raids on the homes of 12 people in Iceland, being cases in point
The movie studios are reporting record profits and the members of Big Four record cartel are raking it in as well - Warner Music says it has “significant” cash in hand and plans to “provide for a return of capital” of up to $350 million to shareholders.
So leaving aside whether or not file sharers are indeed guilty of bringing rack-and-ruin to the multi-billion-dollar movie and music industries, what will happen if all of the many and various entities that fall under the Hollywood umbrella decide to follow suit, paying file-share scalp-hunters such as Overpeer and temporary hires to load the networks with millions upon millions of fake files, many of which will in turn be downloaded?
More to come.
- User Name: Harm0nicsDept904_21493
- Connection Type: 56K
- Files shared: 200
- Elapsed time online: 3:08:16
- Transfer Status: 101 of 196 available
- User Name: MarinnaNeely_87835_26532
- Connection Type: T3+
- Files shared: 200
- Elapsed time online: 7:16:55
- Transfer Status: 20 of 77 available
- Time/date of report: Wed Oct 06 08:25:36 2004
- User Name: Letitia_76160_59289
- Connection Type: 28.8K
- Files shared: 200
- Elapsed time online: 1:45:07
- Transfer Status: 45 of 105 available
- Time/date of report: Wed Oct 06 08:26:01 2004
- User Name: GrayceMawji36789_14642
- Connection Type: 33.6K
- Files shared: 200
- Elapsed time online: 6:15:28
- Transfer Status: 28 of 197 available
- Time/date of report: Wed Oct 06 08:26:22 2004
- User Name: AlexinePisani_123_17727
- Connection Type: T3+
- Files shared: 200
- Elapsed time online: 7:14:13
- Transfer Status: 125 of 175 available
- Time/date of report: Wed Oct 06 11:43:07 2004
- User Name: NurettinRebate222_37792
- Connection Type: 128K ISDN
- Files shared: 200
- Elapsed time online: 9:45:10
- Transfer Status: 5 of 93 available
- What do all of these have in common?
==================
See:-
Digital Hollywood - File-sharing debaters swap harsh words, CNETÂ News, Septemer 29, 2004
Ratiatum.com - Loudeye’s ’secret’ spoofs, p2pnet, October 1, 2004
sue ‘em all - RIAA sues another 762, October 1, 2004
raids - MPAA raids Iceland, p2pnet, October 1, 2004





p2pnet - rss feed: 
October 6th, 2004 at 10:11 pm
This doesnt help nor discourage me personally, for a few reasons:
This is why the studio networks and Riaa dont make this into a news topic, they know if they censor any discussion about it people will remain ignorant to its being. (Ironically though, usenet has been around way before the internet, p2p, or even software started to become commercially available. While these guys were in pampers, doing the studio’s bidding, files were transfered by this means for many years)
1. If i was still using a now-defunct p2p client like kazaa or winmx, theres such a thing as “preview mode” so you can see if the video is really the movie or not within a matter of no time. Commonly, its a blank movie, other times its mislabeled crap, like anime and other useless garbage. That takes care of that problem.
2. I use the newsgroups, the most loved and hated filesharing system in the world, still 100% anonymous by means of transfer and sharing. Upload the file once: Millions can grab it.
October 6th, 2004 at 11:19 pm
It’s called AVI Preview.
October 6th, 2004 at 11:35 pm
….. among other methods and means
October 7th, 2004 at 12:47 pm
Which is why I rarely use the search option in eMule. I use verified links from filesharing forums. Even if they were to fake there then someone would let others know pretty soon that that was the case and the releaser would get banned. Usenet is sporadic at best. Most newsfeeds (Especially free ones) have bad feeds and lots of incompletes. Uploading to usenet can be risky too. I got a letter from a studio via my ISP for uploading a movie to usenet once. I’d say usenet is way more risky than P2P.
October 16th, 2004 at 8:33 am
what it all boils down to is that the RIAA and all the other “people”who are flooding our networks are just plain GREEDY they want more mony.if they were smart theyd realize that moast of the people who bootleg music and movies dont have the mony to buy cds & tapes &dvds anyway ,so ether we get free music and the companys dont get any mony or we dont get free music and the companys dont get any mony . its ether a win-lose situation or a lose-lose situation.
PS -sorry for bad spelling
November 6th, 2004 at 8:54 am
There are almost 3000 fake Shark Tale files on WinMx. Whois reports most users as having 800 shared files.
December 7th, 2004 at 11:57 pm
idiot
January 3rd, 2005 at 8:55 am
What? Is there a problem with people ripping off thieves?
January 7th, 2005 at 8:17 am
the prior remarks are the expressed views of another moron!
January 8th, 2005 at 6:04 am
Shhhhh… Don’t tell all these users that their networks are now defunct! Plus these stats don’t include the winmx network which numbers in the millions at any given time. I just love listening to the proverbial experts. LOL
As of January 3, 2005 - 19:00
Network Users
eDonkey2K: 2,698,388
FastTrack: 2,065,657
Warez: 1,402,729
Gnutella: 1,115,086
Overnet: 1,056,558
DirectConnect: 273,485
MP2P: 264,043
Filetopia 4,430
So you do the math…