Bell vs Rogers speed claims
p2pnet news view Freedom | P2P:- As two of Canada’s biggest Internet service providers, Bell Canada and Rogers Communications are fierce rivals that frequently battle for the same customers. That marketplace fight rarely spills into the courtroom, yet last month a Rogers advertising campaign prompted Bell to file a $50 million dollar lawsuit.
The result was an end to the campaign and evidence both companies over-promise the speed of their Internet services.
The case began when Rogers launched a direct mail and Internet ad campaign called “Check Your Speed.” The campaign warned users the Internet services “you are paying for may not be what you’re getting” and encouraged them to test their connection with an independent third party.
The campaign unsurprisingly offered Rogers services as an alternative, promising a “reliable speed every time you connect.”
Just days after the launch, Bell filed suit, arguing in court documents violations of the Trade-Mark Act, Competition Act, along with various torts. The company sought $50 million in general damages, $1 million in punitive damages, and an injunction blocking Rogers from continuing with its campaign.
Two days later, Rogers dropped the third party testing feature. Rather than using a fully independent third party service, Rogers had used a server located in Seattle, Washington to run its tests.
The court found that the distance between users in Ontario and the speed test server in Washington might help account for slower speeds.
Even more telling was the evidence that placed the spotlight on a Canadian industry practice of advertising the maximum or “up to” speeds for customers, rather than minimum or actual speeds that customers typically obtain. The Rogers campaign was effectively premised on this discrepancy since it encouraged users to check their speeds where they would undoubtedly learn their typical speeds were lower than those promised by their ISP. The same holds true for Rogers, however.
Under cross-examination, a Rogers witness was asked about the Rogers service: “if he [the customer] runs the test, and it tells him that his Internet connection speed is less than 10 megabits per second, is he still getting the Internet speed that he’s paying for? ”
The response? “The Internet speed he’s paying for is “up to,” as is industry practice. So I believe the answer is yes. We sell an “up to” service, as is industry practice.”
It is this “industry practice” that deserves far closer scrutiny from Canada’s telecommunications and competition regulators. While the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission has done little to address the issue, its counterparts in the United Kingdom and Australia have taken action.
Late last month, Ofcom, the British telecommunications regulator, released the results of a study that found more than 50 per cent of broadband users in that country are receiving less than half the speed promised by their providers. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission addressed this issue several years ago, with guidelines for ISPs designed to counter misleading “up to” speed claims.
The Canadian practices are particularly deceiving since ISPs have also been slow to disclose their traffic management practices, which may often result in deliberate slowdowns for certain applications. Rogers recently admitted it charges tiered pricing for faster upload speeds but that all tiers are throttled to the same speed when using peer-to-peer applications.
As Canada’s ISPs battle in court over which company is more deceptive, it is time for Canadian regulators to step in by conducting their own tests on promised speeds and establish clear requirements that bring truth back to ISP advertising.
Michael Geist – Michael Geist’s Blog
[Geist is the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. He can be reached by email at mgeist @ uottawa dot ca]
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi
August, 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
August 11th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
It’s also interesting how these 2 companies are BOTH not only advertising how each can supposedly save you $25/month if you dump the other, but they’re both also using the same “couch” imagery.
Bell and Rogers… “competing”???… That’s a good one!
Unless, when you say “compete”, you mean it in the same sense that the Liberals and Conservatives “compete”.
Bell and Rogers are each, in their own ways, an insult to the human intelligence.
Combined, they’re just flushing the Canadian internet scene down the fuckin’ toilet.