Hollywood’s MPAA: lax in Canada
p2pnet news view Politics | Movies:- Hollywood’s efforts to ‘persuade’ the cartel-friendly Harper government to introduce a hard-core US Digital Millennium Copyright Act law in Canada are unceasing.
When Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music, and Time-Warner, Fox, Disney, Columbia, Paramount, MGM, say ‘Jump,’ governments around the world, ask anxiously, ‘How high?‘
And Canada is no exception
Now, “The Canadian Motion Picture Distributors Association (and its parent MPAA), which represents the major Hollywood studios, is one of the leading voices for DMCA-style legislation,” blogs Michael Geist, going on »»»
It is also one of the most effective Canadian lobby groups as evidenced by the amazing speed with which it convinced Canada to become one of the only countries in the world to enact specific anti-camcording legislation (what made it particularly remarkable was that Canadian officials believed for months that the law already addressed the issue and the industry did little more than provide wildly inconsistent statistics and threaten to withhold some film screenings).
Interestingly, while the CMPDA claims that it needs stronger enforcement powers in Canada, David Allsebrook, a top IP lawyer with LudlowLaw, points out in his forthcoming submission to the copyright consultation that the industry has seemingly little interest in pursuing criminal copyright cases in Canada.
Allsebrook highlights the fact that the movie industry does not appear to regularly register its own films with CIPO. Although registration is not required under the law, it is pretty standard if one anticipates possible enforcement action. As Allsebrook notes:
The MPAA is trying to manoeuvre Canada and all other countries into enforcing its members’ rights for them, at the countries’ expense. MPAA members have no intention of seeking criminal prosecution for copyright infringement of their movies in Canada.
The MPAA’s strategy can be simply demonstrated. In order to prove criminal copyright infringement in Canada, the first step is to file in evidence a Canadian copyright registration, because it substitutes for expensive witnesses as proof of the existence and ownership of copyright, unless there is a reason to question its veracity.
However to be admissible the copyright must have been registered in Canada before the infringement took place. The ten top-grossing movies of 2009, as of the end of July, were all produced by members of the MPAA. Only three of the ten movies’ copyrights were registered in Canada by that time. The registration fee is $50.00, and registration may be done very simply, and online, from anywhere in the world.
The lack of registration is particularly telling since the MPAA believes that 90 percent of its piracy comes from copies of movies made by videotaping a showing of the movie in a cinema. The most damaging piracy takes place at the beginning of the film’s release, when the infringing copies can circulate around the world electronically long before the film is exhibited or authorized copies released internationally. The MPAA members have not taken the most basic step towards stopping this activity in Canadian Courts.
I conducted a similar review of the top 10 grossing U.S. films as of last week. At the moment, only half have Canadian copyright registrations.
Top 10 U.S. Grossing Movies (2009) Canadian Copyright Registration Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen No Up Yes Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince No The Hangover No Star Trek No Monsters Vs. Aliens No Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs Yes X-Men Origins: Wolverine Yes Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian Yes Fast and Furious Allsebrook continues by noting that the MPAA/CMPDA has emphasized the need for stronger border measures and customs seizures, all of which shifts the cost of enforcement from the Hollywood studios to the Canadian taxpayer.
“The CMPDA has used the copyright consultation to argue for anti-circumvention legislation and greater ISP policing, yet it appears that its own members don’t even fully use the most basic of Canadian copyright protections – the registration of their films,” Geist adds.
NOTE: MPAA stands for Motion Picture Association of America, not Motion Picture Association of America & Canada.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi
How high? – Hop to it! – Hollywood orders New Zealand, August 13, 2009
blogs Michael Geist – Is The MPAA Serious About Enforcing Its Copyrights in Canada?, August 14, 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
August 14th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
I wish the masses of Canadians and Americans were more up on this, then they’d stand up and do something.
A small percentage, us, is not enough weight to sway politicians to use their brains instead of being blinded by $$$ and inaccurate/misleading information from these “trade groups.”
I wonder, who funded the WIPO conferences? I’m willing to bet the same people who have vested interest in making you pay $1 every time you hear/play/sing/think of a song, segment of a song, article, movie, book, etc..