<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JetGroove STOP notice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2728/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2728</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2728/comment-page-1#comment-6350</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6350</guid>
		<description>Ah!

I was wondering it there was more to it than the article mentionned.

If they charge you without giving you ANYTHING in return,
then they must be forced to refund you.

NOWHERE in the story was it mentioned that you paid and they put you on hold
because they did not in fact have the track for download.

But this is a scam upon the users of the site,
not on the record labels as the article stated.

Thanks for clearing that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah!</p>
<p>I was wondering it there was more to it than the article mentionned.</p>
<p>If they charge you without giving you ANYTHING in return,<br />
then they must be forced to refund you.</p>
<p>NOWHERE in the story was it mentioned that you paid and they put you on hold<br />
because they did not in fact have the track for download.</p>
<p>But this is a scam upon the users of the site,<br />
not on the record labels as the article stated.</p>
<p>Thanks for clearing that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2728/comment-page-1#comment-6336</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6336</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re forgetting one thing - some people actually paid money (minimum charge $20) to download some tracks, just to find out that most of the files are UNAVAILABLE. i personally tried to purchase an album, and it wasn&#039;t available for downloads. but i did pay $20 to find out! i emailed jetgroove and asked to get my money back, but after almoust 10 days i still haven&#039;t received any reply. also - they&#039;ve listed a lot of UNRELEASED and even UNEXISTING material! if this is not a scam then what  ?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re forgetting one thing &#8211; some people actually paid money (minimum charge $20) to download some tracks, just to find out that most of the files are UNAVAILABLE. i personally tried to purchase an album, and it wasn&#8217;t available for downloads. but i did pay $20 to find out! i emailed jetgroove and asked to get my money back, but after almoust 10 days i still haven&#8217;t received any reply. also &#8211; they&#8217;ve listed a lot of UNRELEASED and even UNEXISTING material! if this is not a scam then what  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2728/comment-page-1#comment-6320</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6320</guid>
		<description>So now posting INFORMATION about intellectual property is illegal?

I do not see what the problem is with having a list of tracks.
Not much problem with recording user interest with a track,
then trying to obtain a deal to provide it either.
They don&#039;t have the tracks that they&#039;re not allowed to sell (presumably).

So what did they ceased and desist?
Nothing.
The &quot;on hold&quot; feature that let&#039;s you ask for songs not available seems to still be there.

Of course I have not used the service so if anyone has more information please post it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now posting INFORMATION about intellectual property is illegal?</p>
<p>I do not see what the problem is with having a list of tracks.<br />
Not much problem with recording user interest with a track,<br />
then trying to obtain a deal to provide it either.<br />
They don&#8217;t have the tracks that they&#8217;re not allowed to sell (presumably).</p>
<p>So what did they ceased and desist?<br />
Nothing.<br />
The &#8220;on hold&#8221; feature that let&#8217;s you ask for songs not available seems to still be there.</p>
<p>Of course I have not used the service so if anyone has more information please post it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


