<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Music vs The Invisibles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/28851/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/28851</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thegiant</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/28851/comment-page-1#comment-984900</link>
		<dc:creator>thegiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=28851#comment-984900</guid>
		<description>@robert: because they&#039;re all communists</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@robert: because they&#8217;re all communists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/28851/comment-page-1#comment-984768</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=28851#comment-984768</guid>
		<description>&quot; i read in a comment here that she says sheâs quitting
the music business. if thatâs true, how will she get out
of her contracts without being sued? &quot;

 Because it&#039;s probably not true.

 Her leashholders are probably going to just suck it 
 up for about a year, and then push her out again as
 the &#039;newest thing&#039; hoping that everyone has forgotten
 this episode of stupid.

 The saddest part of it is that they are probably right.
 They know exactly how long it takes the majority to
 forget, and the smal rest of us can&#039;t get enough 
 attention to worry them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; i read in a comment here that she says sheâs quitting<br />
the music business. if thatâs true, how will she get out<br />
of her contracts without being sued? &#8221;</p>
<p> Because it&#8217;s probably not true.</p>
<p> Her leashholders are probably going to just suck it<br />
 up for about a year, and then push her out again as<br />
 the &#8216;newest thing&#8217; hoping that everyone has forgotten<br />
 this episode of stupid.</p>
<p> The saddest part of it is that they are probably right.<br />
 They know exactly how long it takes the majority to<br />
 forget, and the smal rest of us can&#8217;t get enough<br />
 attention to worry them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catflap</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/28851/comment-page-1#comment-984627</link>
		<dc:creator>catflap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=28851#comment-984627</guid>
		<description>the bbc is reporting that lily allen attended/is attending this
so-called meeting, although she has stated that she won&#039;t
attend because she didn&#039;t want to start a media frenzy.

did she attend?

whether she did/does, it&#039;s only because her owners tell
her to go/not go.

she says she pulled the blog because of &quot;the abuse&quot;.
that&#039;s BS. her owners pulled it - or ordered her to pull it.
either way, she was the only person there spouting abuse...
and to her fans! what a cunt. most other people there had
something to say, whether right or wrong.

she&#039;s complained that she and all musicians
with big music contracts have to slave for years
in order to repay them for advances and fulfill their
contracts. if that&#039;s the way she feels she should go
indie and not be a slave to big music anymore.

i read in a comment here that she says she&#039;s quitting
the music business. if that&#039;s true, how will she get out
of her contracts without being sued?

either way, i&#039;ll never buy any of her shit now. i might have
wanted to sample some through p2p, and if i liked it i might
have bought it. but both scenarios are now out of the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the bbc is reporting that lily allen attended/is attending this<br />
so-called meeting, although she has stated that she won&#8217;t<br />
attend because she didn&#8217;t want to start a media frenzy.</p>
<p>did she attend?</p>
<p>whether she did/does, it&#8217;s only because her owners tell<br />
her to go/not go.</p>
<p>she says she pulled the blog because of &#8220;the abuse&#8221;.<br />
that&#8217;s BS. her owners pulled it &#8211; or ordered her to pull it.<br />
either way, she was the only person there spouting abuse&#8230;<br />
and to her fans! what a cunt. most other people there had<br />
something to say, whether right or wrong.</p>
<p>she&#8217;s complained that she and all musicians<br />
with big music contracts have to slave for years<br />
in order to repay them for advances and fulfill their<br />
contracts. if that&#8217;s the way she feels she should go<br />
indie and not be a slave to big music anymore.</p>
<p>i read in a comment here that she says she&#8217;s quitting<br />
the music business. if that&#8217;s true, how will she get out<br />
of her contracts without being sued?</p>
<p>either way, i&#8217;ll never buy any of her shit now. i might have<br />
wanted to sample some through p2p, and if i liked it i might<br />
have bought it. but both scenarios are now out of the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/28851/comment-page-1#comment-984620</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=28851#comment-984620</guid>
		<description>Why is it the only people in that group supporting Lily are all union leaders (what a shock, think of CAW &quot;logic&quot;) and execs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it the only people in that group supporting Lily are all union leaders (what a shock, think of CAW &#8220;logic&#8221;) and execs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


