p2pnet - rss feed: Spooky data storage?
p2pnet.net News:- Albert Einstein didn’t like quantum entanglement.
But inventor Michael Thomas does.
The creator of the Atomic Holographic DVR disc drive, he’s already shown that controlling and monitoring the exchange of electric fields, electromagnetic fields, electrostatic fields, UV photons, electrons and the delocalization of the central nucleus of ferroelectric molecules lets the molecules act as an Atomic Switch.
Now he’s working on a data storage system that can be entangled in time and space and that will function as two completely independent information collection systems in a virtual quantum universe where sending encrypted information by means of entangled particles - even when the particles are a billion miles apart - suddenly becomes possible.
He told p2pnet his new and unique non-contact semiconductor integrated read/write head will use photons from an ultra-violet/deep blue laser for storing and retrieving data to an Entangled Particle Holographic Optical Disk.
“Information communication in the world between two sources will be done in the most secured method using entangled particle holographic optical data nanostorage,” he says
Einstein thought quantum entanglement ran counter to a central tenet of his theory of relativity that nothing, not even information, can travel faster than the speed of light.
In quantum mechanics, all the forces of nature are mediated by the exchange of particles such as photons, and these particles must obey this cosmic speed limit.
So an action ‘here’ can cause no effect ‘over there’ any sooner than it would take light to travel there in a vacuum.
Quantum entanglement happens when two or more particles interact in a way that causes their fates to become, well, entangled.
When this happens, it’s possible to envisage (or mathematically describe) each particle’s condition independently of the others’.
Together, they constitute a single quantum state and appear to influence each other instantaneously no matter if they’re in the same room or at opposite ends of the Universe.
Einstein called this ‘spooky action at a distance’ - spooky because although it’s been theorized, at the moment, there’s no known mechanism for such an interaction; and, because it would mean things can be affected by events which haven’t actually happened.
And it’s this that’ll eventually allow Thomas to create unbreakable, entangled data gathering systems.
The gif below may take a while to load, but be patient - it’s worth the wait.
===================
See:-
Atomic Holographic - Every file you ever owned on 1 disc, p2pnet, February 25, 2004
already shown - Switching the light fantastic, p2pnet, April 14, 2004
November 6th, 2004 at 9:39 pm
The whole thing is highly hypothetical and inaccurate as far as I can tell.
Entanglement works only on two particles of light at a time.
So you would need to combine and then separate each particle individually for them to make them entangled.
This would be highly costly and complicated.
And as far as I know there is no proof that the particles would stay entangled at different ends of the earth,
much less at vaster distances.
They might become contaminated by surrounding matter over time and lose entanglement.
The whole animation show is so very without basis of any kind
that we might as well be considering psychic teleportation like the U. S. Air Force is doing.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=711&u=/usatoday/20041105/tc_usatoday/airforcereportcallsfor75mtostudypsychicteleportation&printer=1”
Sorry if the link breaks the formatting, we cannot make html links in these edit boxes.
Nor can we make the font bold or italic or anything much.
Rather unsophisticated for text formatting.
November 7th, 2004 at 12:41 am
You need to read about entangled electrons, etc. True photons are
one of the principals for entanglement but not the only one.
I recommend reading Schroeder and Bell to start for further
background in quantum entanglement.
There is proof of entangled electrons in http://prl.aps.org/ and
http://scitation.aip.org/aplo/?jsessionid=1948981070561272509
I am a scientist who is working with others starting research in an area
that little is know and to say you are an expert where their are
none, well that really defies befief.
Further, to say science should only focus on entangled photons is unrealistic.
November 7th, 2004 at 9:10 pm
well, where is this thing ? he’s sure good at pr but kinda short on delivering a product I can use.