Comments on: Brooke Shields nude photo scandal http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Phil Indeblancs http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-1064704 Phil Indeblancs Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:19:15 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-1064704 Crossing out prepubescent nudity is in fact sexualising the child. The Brooke Shield photos were "commissioned" by Teri Shields, the girls mother, as part of a publicity campaign and when the photos were taken in 1974 child nudity was legal but when published Shields was prosecuted and paid a fine of under $2000. However the film Pretty Baby where full frontal nudity of Brooke appeared as she was beginning to develop was, in fact, allowed to play in theaters and later on Showtime and it continues today on DVD and video downloads. What I am saying is: "Filth is in the eye of the beholder." Crossing out prepubescent nudity is in fact sexualising the child. The Brooke Shield photos were “commissioned” by Teri Shields, the girls mother, as part of a publicity campaign and when the photos were taken in 1974 child nudity was legal but when published Shields was prosecuted and paid a fine of under $2000. However the film Pretty Baby where full frontal nudity of Brooke appeared as she was beginning to develop was, in fact, allowed to play in theaters and later on Showtime and it continues today on DVD and video downloads. What I am saying is: “Filth is in the eye of the beholder.”

]]> By: am http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-1063740 am Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:38:25 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-1063740 what was her mom thinking letting a 10 year old be photographed in the nude! this should be against th elaw! what was her mom thinking letting a 10 year old be photographed in the nude! this should be against th elaw!

]]> By: reader http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-999829 reader Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:12:01 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-999829 http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/8236/klaraandeddabellydancin.jpg no censor fk censor http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/8236/klaraandeddabellydancin.jpg no censor fk censor

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-985717 Reader's Write Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:22:20 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-985717 I thought it was a still from Pretty Baby at first... I thought it was a still from Pretty Baby at first…

]]> By: catflap http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-985708 catflap Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:00:32 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-985708 lately? this has been the trend since 1980, when reagan politicized religion and "family values" crap. lately? this has been the trend since 1980, when reagan politicized religion and “family values” crap.

]]> By: Devil's Advocate http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-985452 Devil's Advocate Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:28:15 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-985452 As much as I abhor pedophiles and exploitive child pornography, I have to question this almost automatic classification of everything involving child nudity/partial nudity as "pornography". Certainly, some images exist to make other, non-sexual statements. And, what of "Pretty Baby"?? Is it suddenly the opinion of the masses that this movie was "nothing more than child pornography"? Tread carefully, people, before you consign us all the police state you seem to be asking for lately! As much as I abhor pedophiles and exploitive child pornography, I have to question this almost automatic classification of everything involving child nudity/partial nudity as “pornography”. Certainly, some images exist to make other, non-sexual statements.

And, what of “Pretty Baby”??
Is it suddenly the opinion of the masses that this movie was “nothing more than child pornography”?

Tread carefully, people, before you consign us all the police state you seem to be asking for lately!

]]> By: Jon http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-985437 Jon Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:54:08 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-985437 ^^ Fixed. Thanks. Cheers! ^^ Fixed. Thanks.

Cheers!

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/29285/comment-page-1#comment-985435 Reader's Write Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:37:08 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=29285#comment-985435 Your link for unqestionably pornographic is a blank http:/// (note the three slashes). And yeah, I managed to download a really high res, uncensored version of that picture yesterday and agree that it's definitely soft kiddie porn. However, what harm this particular picture does is another matter. It isn't harmful. Your link for unqestionably pornographic is a blank http:/// (note the three slashes).

And yeah, I managed to download a really high res, uncensored version of that picture yesterday and agree that it’s definitely soft kiddie porn.

However, what harm this particular picture does is another matter. It isn’t harmful.

]]>