Comments on: Janet Jackson’s mammary memory

By: 3g5h2d

3g5h2d — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:25:30 +0000

sdasdsad

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:51:35 +0000

Get the t**s out for the lads!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:59:39 +0000

true

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:20:19 +0000

The publicity was cheap at the price.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:18:44 +0000

I agree 100% that Justin Timberlake got off. Everytime I hear about this incident, the only name that is mostly mentioned is Janet’s. Timberlake was the big man who said that he wanted to give us “something to talk about” after the performance, but later changed his tune when people started talking too much about it. Now his name is almost never included. But I guess such is life in this society of ours.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:15:35 +0000

Actually, Janet Jackson herself was not fined as far as I can tell.

Nor were the affiliate stations not owned by CBS.

CBS owned stations received all the fines.

Hurray for live shows, right?

You would think you would not be held responsible for what goes live that you have no control over.

Apparently not.

So who is going to market live censorship filters?
After all, if you’re going to censor you might as well be efficient, right?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:38:46 +0000

It still boggles the mind that Justin Timberlake got off scot free. He was a major player in the incident. After all, he was the one who actually tore her shirt off. But no. Let the woman take all the heat…