Comments on: Skinny Ralph Lauren model and the DMCA

By: Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew)

Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew) — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:32:27 +0000

If anyone is Interested more, photoshop disasters on NineMSN lol >> http://tinyurl.com/yf3lnra

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:12:22 +0000

no, i really don’t see anything wrong with the photo. she’s a very pretty girl. and a babe.

By: Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew)

Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew) — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:35:18 +0000

Vote +1 epic quote ‘no reason why it should pay attention to a piece of purely american crap’

Dont forget DRM Jon and Dan ‘The Joker’(lol love it ha) Glickman

Yet, the sad Irony is that this law is only enactable on US soil, and void everywhere else. DMCA cant save you from fail heh.

By: Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew)

Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew) — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:26:29 +0000

lol I read about this xD

Photoshop failed hard and to the above comments (I dont know if your being sarcastic) saying shes ‘gorgeous’ Her head is bigger than her body lol

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:57:02 +0000

she’s gorgeous. a babe!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:14:13 +0000

she looks terrible

By: Jeff

Jeff — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:29:11 +0000

Ralph Lauren, meet Streisand Effect.

To quote Cory:

‘This is classic fair use: a reproduction “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting,” etc,’ writes Doctorow. ‘Copyright law doesn’t give you the right to threaten your critics for pointing out the problems with your offerings.’ Doctorow adds that every time Lauren threatens to sue he will ‘reproduce the original criticism, making damned sure that all our readers get a good, long look at it,’ ‘publish your spurious legal threat along with copious mockery,’ and ‘offer nourishing soup and sandwiches to your models.’”

By: Dreddsnik

Dreddsnik — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:23:31 +0000

” And again, whatâs the âdisasterâ? Itâs itâs a nice photo of a very pretty girl. ”

To each their own, but I personally find nothing attractive whatsoever
in skeletal figures. If it is a photo of a real girl ( considering the name
of the site ‘Photoshop disasters’ I doubt it ) it is a medical and psychological
disaster.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:38:52 +0000

And again, what’s the “disaster”? It’s itâs a nice photo of a very pretty girl.

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:10:36 +0000

Obviously the girl’s image was “cinched” in PhotoShop.
A classic example of a “PhotoShop Disaster”.

The site it was displayed on was not only an appropriate venue, but also CANADIAN.
Since when did the DMCA become law up here??

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:19:51 +0000

what’s the problem? it’s a nice photo of a very pretty girl.

so it was used without permission. that’s news?

By: Quartz

Quartz — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:17:58 +0000

That lady needs a decent meal or two.