Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Benoit Mandelbrot interview

p2pnet.net News:- Benoit Mandelbrot is famous as the founder of fractal geometry

Now Sterling professor of mathematical sciences at Yale University, he turns 80 next week.

Valerie Jamieson recently interviewed him and the results are featured in New Scientist. Below, to give you a taste, are her first three questions, and Mandelbrot’s answers.

Jamieson: What is it like seeing the Mandelbrot set emblazoned on T-shirts and posters?

Mandelbrot: I’m delighted. I always felt that science as the preserve of people from Oxbridge or Ivy League universities – and not for the common mortal – was a very bad idea.

Jamieson: Even though most people view it as a beautiful image and ignore the underlying mathematics?

Mandelbrot:That’s right. Yet there is nothing more to this than a simple iterative formula. It is so simple that most children can program their home computers to produce the Mandelbrot set.

Jamieson: How did you feel when you discovered it?

Mandelbrot: Its astounding complication was completely out of proportion with what I was expecting. Here is the curious thing: the first night I saw the set, it was just wild. The second night, I became used to it. After a few nights, I became familiar with it. It was as if somehow I had seen it before. Of course I hadn’t. No one had seen it. No one had described it. The fact that a certain aspect of its mathematical nature remains mysterious, despite hundreds of brilliant people working on it, is the icing on the cake to me.

He also says:

"What motivates me now are ideas I developed 10, 20 or 30 years ago, and the feeling that these ideas may be lost if I don’t push them a little bit further. Does that matter? Most ideas in science that are abandoned are picked up by someone else later, but not all. I have reflected on this issue a great deal. Perhaps I would like to finish my ideas for aesthetic reasons – a feeling of closure."

What’s he working on now?

"My work is more varied than at any other point in my life. I am still carrying out research in pure mathematics. And I am working on an idea that I had several years ago on negative dimensions."

===================

See:-
a simple iterative formulaA fractal life, New Scientist

HOME

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®