Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

RIAA (oops, DoJ) Duke Uni ‘piracy’ study

p2pnet news view | P2P | Music:- ‘Piracy’ is a big problem for Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music because »»»

A) People who share music with each other online are all criminal pirates and thieves who’d be buying absolute tons of corporate product if they weren’t sharing; or,

B) Piracy equals demand without supply?

Tick the box you believe is true.

The first is the Big 4’s official position and the second, the opinion of Alice Taylor, commissioning editor for education at Britain’s Channel 4 TV.

So, “Why do some individuals pay for digital music while others choose to pirate it?” – asks a new study jointly manufactured by the RIAA’s DoJ and  Duke University.

Called, impressively, The Determinants of Music Piracy in a Sample of College Students, “With the development and adoption of digital music, the music industry went through a profound transformation in the way music is consumed, it says, going on »»»

With this transformation, digital music piracy has emerged as a crime of national scale and concern.

A “crime of national scale and concern,” eh?

To quote the absrtact in full »»»

Why do some individuals pay for digital music while others choose to pirate it? With the development and adoption of digital music, the music industry went through a profound transformation in the way music is consumed. With this transformation, digital music piracy has emerged as a crime of national scale and concern. Using survey data from a sample of undergraduate students at a Southern private university, we first estimate our respondents’ willingness to pay (WTP) for digital music by way of a simple random pricing experiment. We then investigate the determinants of music piracy by regressing a dummy variable for whether a respondent’s last downloaded song was obtained illegally on (i) our WTP estimate, used here as a source of artificial variation in the price of legal music; and (ii) the various transaction costs associated with the consumption of illegal music. We find that a respondent’s WTP, her subjective assessment of the probability that she will face a lawsuit, and her degree of morality all have a negative impact on the likelihood that her last song was obtained illegally.

So only women students were surveyed, apparently. ;)

Says Billboard »»»

While “The Determinants of Music Piracy” does not put a firm number on the percent drop in purchases caused by file sharing, it indicates there are factors that cause people to choose file sharing over purchasing. In this sense, file sharing is viewed a substitute for purchasing. But there will be cases in which a student values the song enough to buy it. So just as there are times a student chooses file sharing over purchasing, there will be some instances in which purchasing is chosen over file sharing.

Here are a few notable items from the paper:

• Just over 30% of students had obtained their last song illegally.
• For every $0.01 increase in price faced by the student, the willingness to buy the song decreased by 0.3% on average.
• For a 1% increase in the student’s assessment of the likelihood of getting caught pirating music, the likelihood the student’s last song was obtained illegally decreases by almost 0.5%.
• A student who had received an iTunes gift card was 15% less likely to pirate his/her last song.
• The lower the annual income of the student’s parents, the more likely he/she was to have pirated his/her last song.

“The authors concluded the RIAA should not have stopped its campaign against individual file sharers if its sole goal was to deter piracy,” the story adds.

Say the authors, “Our findings nevertheless indicate that the threat of legal action had a significant impact at the margin on our respondents’ decision to pirate music.”

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

1p Subscribe

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

RIAA’s DoJ - Jenner & Block – running the DoJ?,  April 26, 2009
opinion of Alice Taylor
– Piracy equals demand without supply: TV boss, October 19, 2009
Billboard
– Study: Piracy Impacted By Price, Punishment and Morality, October 19, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

Study: Piracy Impacted By Price, Punishment and Morality

HOME

5 Responses to “RIAA (oops, DoJ) Duke Uni ‘piracy’ study”

  1. Eric Says:

    Like Eric Idle once said, “Here is the address to complain to.”

    Marc F. Bellemare
    Duke University – Sanford School of Public Policy
    marc.bellemare@duke.edu
    Andrew M. Holmberg
    Department of Justice
    andrew.m.holmberg@gmail.com

  2. jbond Says:

    It’s a while since we talked about this, but even after several years (and thousands of MP3s) the song remains the same.

    ” For every $0.01 increase in price faced by the student, the willingness to buy the song decreased by 0.3% on average.”

    Turn this around.

    “For every $0.01 DEcrease in price faced by the student, the willingness to BUY the song INcreased by 0.3% on average.”

    Keep that up and you’ll hit a price point which competes with free. Where the willingness to buy the song and avoid the hassle of inconsistent quality, bad tagging, bad filenames and search effort outweighs the cost. Remember AllFoMp3? When it was easy to buy access, people who normally got their MP3s from P2P paid them for the privilege instead. And the price break seems to be about $0.10-$0.25 for a track and $1-$2.50 for an album.

    So call me back when I can buy LAME 192Kbps VBR MP3s of obscure albums from Amazon at $1.00 per album. If you’re lucky there’ll still be music I want that I haven’t found yet and you might even get some money out of it.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    “With the development and adoption of digital music, the music industry went through a profound transformation in the way music is consumed”
    ummm, I think they mean they ment to say their customers changed and NOW they are deciding to catch up.

    “With this transformation, digital music piracy has emerged as a crime of national scale and concern”
    - translation : Since they created they problem by not giving the customer what they wanted,(you know delivering the siupply of what was demanded) they decided the obvious solution (as opposed to delivering what was demanded) was to make criminals of their customers.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    “For every $0.01 DEcrease in price faced by the student, the willingness to BUY the song INcreased by 0.3% on average.”

    Don’t give these corporate parasites and criminals ideas to stay in business since at this point they should all die.

    No justice no peace.

  5. ben Says:

    Hold on. If everyone’s doing it, then the law needs to be changed, not the entire population.

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®