<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Google Street View privacy problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30242/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30242</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30242/comment-page-1#comment-987771</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30242#comment-987771</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, under certain circumstances, âthis could pose a danger to children captured in street-level images if a company argues their work constitutes art,â says Denham in the story: âThat raises the spectre of a company not blurring faces at all, and that predators could then obtain the informationâ.&quot;

What information? There&#039;s a school a couple streets over from my house and the camera mobile happened to snap a clear (well, as clear as any of their photos get) of a schoolgirl standing on the sidewalk. I live in the same neighborhood and I have no idea who she is, or how to find her. I could stand there and watch all the kids leave after school and chances are that I wouldn&#039;t be able to spot that particular girl. Sure, maybe a relative or close friend might recognize her, but it&#039;s not like you can click on the image and get &quot;Melissa Johnson, age 13, 231 Oak St.&quot; It&#039;s just a blurry pic of a girl, no different than what I see every time I go to a store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, under certain circumstances, âthis could pose a danger to children captured in street-level images if a company argues their work constitutes art,â says Denham in the story: âThat raises the spectre of a company not blurring faces at all, and that predators could then obtain the informationâ.&#8221;</p>
<p>What information? There&#8217;s a school a couple streets over from my house and the camera mobile happened to snap a clear (well, as clear as any of their photos get) of a schoolgirl standing on the sidewalk. I live in the same neighborhood and I have no idea who she is, or how to find her. I could stand there and watch all the kids leave after school and chances are that I wouldn&#8217;t be able to spot that particular girl. Sure, maybe a relative or close friend might recognize her, but it&#8217;s not like you can click on the image and get &#8220;Melissa Johnson, age 13, 231 Oak St.&#8221; It&#8217;s just a blurry pic of a girl, no different than what I see every time I go to a store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30242/comment-page-1#comment-987755</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30242#comment-987755</guid>
		<description>&quot;People are simply being idiotic about this.&quot;

Gotta love these people that, because THEY don&#039;t understand the implications raised by all this, just come out and label others &quot;idiots&quot; for having their concerns.  Classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People are simply being idiotic about this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gotta love these people that, because THEY don&#8217;t understand the implications raised by all this, just come out and label others &#8220;idiots&#8221; for having their concerns.  Classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30242/comment-page-1#comment-987715</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30242#comment-987715</guid>
		<description>My issue is that these photos are just that photos. It is not live video from a camera that is always on your street. It won&#039;t help predators. They don&#039;t need to know in advance that so and so has a kid. They can drive down the street and see the signs. People are simply being idiotic about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My issue is that these photos are just that photos. It is not live video from a camera that is always on your street. It won&#8217;t help predators. They don&#8217;t need to know in advance that so and so has a kid. They can drive down the street and see the signs. People are simply being idiotic about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30242/comment-page-1#comment-987672</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30242#comment-987672</guid>
		<description>&quot;Meanwhile, is giant online advertising company Google  trying to reduce the impact of the storm of complaints by posting  phony comments on sites which are critical of Street View?&quot;

Yes it is. Of course.

The shills came out of the wood work fast, as we all saw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, is giant online advertising company Google  trying to reduce the impact of the storm of complaints by posting  phony comments on sites which are critical of Street View?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes it is. Of course.</p>
<p>The shills came out of the wood work fast, as we all saw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


