Comments on: ‘Innocent UK teens’ safe under 3 strikes plan http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30562 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Eric http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30562/comment-page-1#comment-988579 Eric Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:29:34 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30562#comment-988579 Q99: "Wouldn't it be cheaper to just stop criminalizing file sharing? Think of the money it would save the governments, which could then use their freed-up legal resources to tackle serious issues!" Mr Bradshaw: You have the wrong Mr Bradshaw. My name's Terry... now go out for a pass! Q99: “Wouldn’t it be cheaper to just stop criminalizing file sharing? Think of the money it would save the governments, which could then use their freed-up legal resources to tackle serious issues!”

Mr Bradshaw: You have the wrong Mr Bradshaw. My name’s Terry… now go out for a pass!

]]> By: Dreddsnik http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30562/comment-page-1#comment-988539 Dreddsnik Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:10:53 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30562#comment-988539 I am going to translate some of his responses. "The suspension to which you refer – which would be as a very last resort for serial and serious infringement – would be subject to a strict two-stage process. It would not just happen on the basis of an accusation as you seem to suggest in your question." = <b>I am lying</b> Mr Bradshaw: It is new; I have announced it to you today, Mr Watson. = <b> I made it up just now, to get those thieves off of our back </b> Mr Bradshaw: There will be the right of an appeal to a tier one tribunal, yes. = <b> there's not a damn thing you can do about it, we,re rich and you're not. Fuck You </b> Mr Bradshaw: That is the industry’s estimate. It is an estimate that I have not seen challenged by anyone in any serious way. = <b> We pulled this figure out of our ass, and will ignore anything that challenges it. If your lawmakers like their lifestyle they will ignore anything that contradicts us as well. Tough Beans </b> Mr Bradshaw: That is just for the music industry. = <b> The other industries haven't gotten around to making up their own yet, they will. </b> Mr Bradshaw: I do not think it is new that there has to be one for every bill; for it to get through LP it has to have had the sign off on the human rights stuff. = <b> ahhhh, that pesky 'human rights stuff'. It's filed under 'trash' after we finsh wiping our asses with it. </b> Sigh .. too disgusted to continue. I am going to translate some of his responses.

“The suspension to which you refer – which would be as a very last resort for serial and serious infringement – would be subject to a strict two-stage process. It would not just happen on the basis of an accusation as you seem to suggest in your question.” = I am lying

Mr Bradshaw: It is new; I have announced it to you today, Mr Watson. = I made it up just now, to get those thieves off of our back

Mr Bradshaw: There will be the right of an appeal to a tier one tribunal, yes. = there’s not a damn thing you can do about it, we,re rich and you’re not. Fuck You

Mr Bradshaw: That is the industry’s estimate. It is an estimate that I have not seen challenged by anyone in any serious way. = We pulled this figure out of our ass, and will ignore anything that challenges it. If your lawmakers like their lifestyle they will ignore anything that contradicts us as well. Tough Beans

Mr Bradshaw: That is just for the music industry. = The other industries haven’t gotten around to making up their own yet, they will.

Mr Bradshaw: I do not think it is new that there has to be one for every bill; for it to get through LP it has to have had the sign off on the human rights stuff. = ahhhh, that pesky ‘human rights stuff’. It’s filed under ‘trash’ after we finsh wiping our asses with it.

Sigh .. too disgusted to continue.

]]>