<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU vote opens the way to 3 strikes law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670/comment-page-1#comment-988934</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30670#comment-988934</guid>
		<description>No Justice no peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Justice no peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670/comment-page-1#comment-988929</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30670#comment-988929</guid>
		<description>Is this the same sort of &quot;fair and impartial procedure&quot; that they used to force Ireland to sign the Lisbon Treaty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same sort of &#8220;fair and impartial procedure&#8221; that they used to force Ireland to sign the Lisbon Treaty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670/comment-page-1#comment-988886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30670#comment-988886</guid>
		<description>@ EU Citizen.

The item you quote goes on, &quot;However, the text does not demand that authorities in the 27 countries of the E.U. obtain a court order before cutting off someone&#039;s Internet connection ... &quot;

That&#039;s freedom?

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ EU Citizen.</p>
<p>The item you quote goes on, &#8220;However, the text does not demand that authorities in the 27 countries of the E.U. obtain a court order before cutting off someone&#8217;s Internet connection &#8230; &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s freedom?</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EU Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670/comment-page-1#comment-988884</link>
		<dc:creator>EU Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30670#comment-988884</guid>
		<description>You are WRONG !!!! And it&#039;s disgraceful that you shoud publish this kind of nonsense.

Read this for the truth, EU Breaks Deadlock in Debate Over Right to Internet Access http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/181472/eu_breaks_deadlock_in_debate_over_right_to_internet_access.html

After months of often bitter debate, European Union lawmakers reached agreement on how to preserve citizen&#039;s rights to Internet access in a meeting that ended in the early hours of Thursday morning.

The issue, which pits citizens&#039; civil liberties against the rights of content owners such as record and movie companies to protect creative works on the Internet, has blocked the passage of a wide range of laws collectively dubbed the telecoms package.

Although the compromise reached by representatives of the European Parliament, the 27 national governments and the European Commission has still to be confirmed, it is seen as a watershed moment for the proposed laws, which aim to enhance competition among telecoms providers and to adapt users&#039; rights to better suit the Internet age.

The text of the telecoms package now contains a new Internet freedom provision that states that access to the Internet is a human right of every E.U. citizen, and that if authorities take away that right people must have the opportunity to defend themselves; citizens also have an automatic right to mount a legal challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are WRONG !!!! And it&#8217;s disgraceful that you shoud publish this kind of nonsense.</p>
<p>Read this for the truth, EU Breaks Deadlock in Debate Over Right to Internet Access <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/181472/eu_breaks_deadlock_in_debate_over_right_to_internet_access.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/181472/eu_breaks_deadlock_in_debate_over_right_to_internet_access.html</a></p>
<p>After months of often bitter debate, European Union lawmakers reached agreement on how to preserve citizen&#8217;s rights to Internet access in a meeting that ended in the early hours of Thursday morning.</p>
<p>The issue, which pits citizens&#8217; civil liberties against the rights of content owners such as record and movie companies to protect creative works on the Internet, has blocked the passage of a wide range of laws collectively dubbed the telecoms package.</p>
<p>Although the compromise reached by representatives of the European Parliament, the 27 national governments and the European Commission has still to be confirmed, it is seen as a watershed moment for the proposed laws, which aim to enhance competition among telecoms providers and to adapt users&#8217; rights to better suit the Internet age.</p>
<p>The text of the telecoms package now contains a new Internet freedom provision that states that access to the Internet is a human right of every E.U. citizen, and that if authorities take away that right people must have the opportunity to defend themselves; citizens also have an automatic right to mount a legal challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670/comment-page-1#comment-988875</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30670#comment-988875</guid>
		<description>How about a ruling that no individual can be subject to prosecution for copyright infringement, EVER, no ifs, no buts?

Just because you&#039;ve drunk the kool-aid that says no-one can make money selling copies, or that you can&#039;t imagine how anyone could, that doesn&#039;t mean you deserve prosecution because someone liked your podcast so much they sent you a cheque.

Everyone deserves exemption from bankruptcy, not just lazy file-sharers, but hard working reviewers, DJs and remix artists too.

Would you have Kutiman strung up by the cartel the moment you found out he&#039;d received a payment from a fan?

Where the heck did people get the idea that it&#039;s evil to share or remix if you make any money out of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a ruling that no individual can be subject to prosecution for copyright infringement, EVER, no ifs, no buts?</p>
<p>Just because you&#8217;ve drunk the kool-aid that says no-one can make money selling copies, or that you can&#8217;t imagine how anyone could, that doesn&#8217;t mean you deserve prosecution because someone liked your podcast so much they sent you a cheque.</p>
<p>Everyone deserves exemption from bankruptcy, not just lazy file-sharers, but hard working reviewers, DJs and remix artists too.</p>
<p>Would you have Kutiman strung up by the cartel the moment you found out he&#8217;d received a payment from a fan?</p>
<p>Where the heck did people get the idea that it&#8217;s evil to share or remix if you make any money out of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASTROBOY</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/30670/comment-page-1#comment-988861</link>
		<dc:creator>ASTROBOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=30670#comment-988861</guid>
		<description>What is needed is not a hearing to determine if a person actually downloaded a file.  What is needed is a ruling that file trading for personal and non-commercial purposes is not a crime in the first place. A hearing that results in disconnection anyway is kind of like a visit with the principal before you get expelled for a trivial reason.  Which is pretty much what they do today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is needed is not a hearing to determine if a person actually downloaded a file.  What is needed is a ruling that file trading for personal and non-commercial purposes is not a crime in the first place. A hearing that results in disconnection anyway is kind of like a visit with the principal before you get expelled for a trivial reason.  Which is pretty much what they do today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


