Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Beatles online: downloads 55 cents per track

p2pnet news view | P2P | Music:- At last, a digital music sales site has it right.

Kind of.

Bluebeat, a US company, is selling Beatles songs for 55 cents — 25 cents per track + 30 cents for ‘processing’.

That’s still way too high. But it’s considerably better than the $1 and up rip-off demanded by Apple for its iTunes iPod online loader, paid for by gullible consumers.

By dint of repeated use by other corporate music ‘services,’ a minimum of $1 each for tracks worth only a few cents has become the de facto standard.

EMI, which owns the Beates copyrights, is suing the company for you-know-what.

However, the lawsuit notwithstanding, at 7:40 am Pacific, Bluebeat was still offering what seems to be the full range of Beatles tunes.

Not only but also, it’s continuing to stream Beatles albums, including the new remastered versions, for free.

This doesn’t, of course, make any kind of difference to the online availability of songs from the Fab Four. They’ve  been downloadable from the various P2P networks since the year dot.

But anyway, “EMI, which distribs Beatles recordings via an agreement with the group’s music company, Apple Corps, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the company Tuesday in federal court in Los Angeles,” says Variety.

BlueBeat is a division of Media Rights Technologies and “In a twist ripe with irony, representatives of Media Rights Technologies recently wrote to the Librarian of Congress asking that the webcasting licenses of such firms as iTunes, Pandora and MSN Music be revoked on piracy grounds,” says the story.

Meanwhile, EMI has (repeatedly) “expressed anger at the news that the Fab Four were being sold online without its permission,” says Music :) Ally, adding:

“But what about those USB drives. EMI and Apple Corps made the announcement last night, revealing that they will sell 30,000 apple-shaped devices, with the 14 recently-remastered Beatles albums preloaded as FLAC and MP3 files. They go on sale on 7 November in Europe and 8 November in the US, with a price point of £200 in the UK and $279.99 in the US.”

No! Honestly!

Good luck with that, guys. ;)

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

1p Subscribe

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

Variety – Fab Four faux pas, November 4, 2009
Music :) Ally
– Beatles for sale digitally on USB apples as EMI sues BlueBeat, November 4, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

5 Responses to “Beatles online: downloads 55 cents per track”

  1. Check Your Facts Says:

    Your story is inaccurate. The songs are 25c a piece, 30c processing charge PER ORDER. So if you only buy one mp3 its 55c, but if you buy 100 songs its $25.30

    Do some investigative reporting rather than leeching off other articles.

  2. Jon Says:

    @ Check Your Facts

    Thanks for the correction.

    It’s always a such a pleasure to receive a nicely phrased, polite and well-rounded update.

    Cheers!

  3. Anonymous Says:

    here’s a fact that no one should question.
    music labels = monopoly…
    blue beat should be able to compete against itunes and emi as long as they follow the rules concerning paying artists and non-such.
    no one should require “permission” to sell music.

  4. Check Your Facts Says:

    And yet the title of the article remains “Beatles online: downloads 55 cents per track” …

  5. Eric Says:

    Nobody corrected the Beatles when they sang “One After 909″ instead of “The 9:10″.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy