Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

The graph Big Music doesn’t want you to see

p2pnet news view | P2P | Music:- The caption to the image below is:  “This is the graph the record industry doesn`t want you to see.”

Why not?

Because, says Times Labs Online which prepared it, “compiled from a PRS for Music report and the BPI,” it make two things clear »»»

  1. that the growth in live revenue shows no signs of slowing; and,
  2. that live is by far and away the most lucrative section of industry revenue for artists themselves, because they retain such a big percentage of the money from ticket sales.

And hopefully, says the article, “this analysis …  sheds some factual light on the claims and counter-claims that are paranoically sweeping across the music industry establishment, not least that put forward by the singer Lily Allen in this paper recently – and the BPI – that artists are losing out as a result of the fall in sales of recorded of music.”

Even more striking, perhaps, is the discovery that, “revenues accrued by artists themselves have in fact risen over the past 5 years, despite the fall in record sales,” says Times Labs, continuing »»»

It’s interesting too that, overall, industry revenues have grown in the period – though admittedly not by much – which arguably adds strength to the notion that, when the BPI releases its annual report claiming how much ‘the music industry’ has suffered from the growth in illegal file-sharing, what it perhaps should be saying is how much the record labels have suffered.

“For other people in the industry, not least artists, the future arguably holds more promise,” it adds.

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

1p Subscribe

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

Times Labs Online – Do music artists fare better in a world with illegal file-sharing?, November 12, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

5 Responses to “The graph Big Music doesn’t want you to see”

  1. RIAA Hater Says:

    I’ll gladly pay to go see a concert, but I won’t ever pay for a digital download.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Note the red line. It shows record sales as being down. But pirates claim that the industry isn’t losing sales.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    not necessarily. pirates claim that the industry isn’t losing sales because of their downloads. this is true, because they probably won’t buy the record whether or not they download the song. when i download a song, the industry is not losing a sale because i wasn’t going to buy that cd anyway.

  4. jon7272 Says:

    well said i would not buy music im on a low income. and y would i pay 30$ for a cd when i only like 2 songs on it the fact that music companies are losing money could it be we are in a recession people losing jobs trying to pay food and home loans music comes far down the list

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    “when i download a song, the industry is not losing a sale because i wasn’t going to buy that cd anyway”

    And that is THE PROBLEM with the current state of the music industry. They are making music that people are willing to steal. They are not making music that people are willing to buy. This means that most of today’s music is not worth being a fan of. Truly successful artists don’t have “customers”, they have fans.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy