Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Video Protection Alliance scam

p2pnet news view Freedom | P2P:- The Video Protection Alliance (VPA) bills itself as a “fast, secure and convenient way to settle your copyright violations online”.

It generously helps “you, the fan, identify copyright violations, pay a nominal settlement fee, and clear your record”.

So how does it achieve this?

By a business method tried and trusted by Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music’s RIAA.

And the MAFIA.

Extortion.

Put another way, “VPA wants to provide viable settlement options for fans to help avoid costly civil lawsuits and Internet Service Provider (ISP) disconnections,” it says.

Computer scientists at the University of Washington studying P2P networks reported they’d received more than 400 bogus takedown notices in two months, says Wendy Davis on MediaPost.

That was last year and now, “Mike Freedman, an assistant professor of computer science at Princeton, reports that a research system he runs, CoralCDN, recently received around 100 letters alleging copyright infringement,” she says, going on »»»

Freedman says that the infringement allegations were “demonstrably false,” because the IP addresses referenced in the letters weren’t running BitTorrent clients.

What’s worse, the letters, sent by a group called the Video Protection Alliance (which represents adult entertainment companies), didn’t simply request that the infringement cease, but also demanded that the guilty parties pay a “pre-settlement” fee or face litigation.

The notices only identified alleged infringers by their IP address, but didn’t include any names. But the notices instructed recipients to visit a particular site where they could learn the exact amount of their supposed pre-settlement assessment — and, presumably, provide identifying information. Freedman says he didn’t log in, so doesn’t know how much the group intended to charge.

Mediapost has VPA ‘agent’ David Kurzman saying the company typically seeks $10 to $40 to “pre-settle”.

But if it hires a lawyer to “subpoena the name of users, the price of pre-settlement increases to $500,” saysthe story, adding:

“Kurtman also says the group hasn’t yet filed any lawsuits, but plans to in the near future. ‘We just had a lawyer send out a bunch of letters and whoever doesn’t respond to those letters is going to get sued’ … “are

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

p2pnet isn`t a business. It`s a commitment. If it has value for you, please think about making a contribution to help me keep it online. Cheers! And thanks : )

(If you`d like to help but don`t fancy online payments, please email me at p2pnet @ shaw dot ca and I`ll send you my snail-mail address.)

1p Subscribe

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

MediaPostPrinceton Prof Reports Bogus Infringement Notices, November 23, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

3 Responses to “Video Protection Alliance scam”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Governement did not do their job while they were supposed to snap the fingers of the corporation of parasites while they were conducting their illegal, immoral and unjust extortion campaign just like the terrorists they are.

    Now the problem is proliferating because it created a precedent.

    It is urgent to create our own precedent by attacking and killing these corporate terrorists.

  2. Dreddsnik Says:

    ” It is urgent to create our own precedent by attacking and killing these corporate terrorists. ”

    The preceding statement does not reflect the view of this site, it’s owners, or members hereof.
    It is the sole opinion of the poster, and no one, including anyone else here, will ever take such’
    language seriously.

  3. RIAA Hater Says:

    I would also very much like to see corporate terrorists die.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy