<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Entertainment cartel UK 3 Strikes Plan stalled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: German-man</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321/comment-page-1#comment-990693</link>
		<dc:creator>German-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31321#comment-990693</guid>
		<description>What is an &quot;internet pirate&quot;? Why should Peer-to-Peer be illegal? Will this mean that if I own 2 or 3 notebooks linked together through a P2P-router I cant share my photo&#039;s. Why stop there, ban open-source software, ban email traffic, ban all network linkage. This is ludicrous and ridiculous. They moan about &#039;not enough innovation&#039;! What do they expect! What pills are these people taking!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is an &#8220;internet pirate&#8221;? Why should Peer-to-Peer be illegal? Will this mean that if I own 2 or 3 notebooks linked together through a P2P-router I cant share my photo&#8217;s. Why stop there, ban open-source software, ban email traffic, ban all network linkage. This is ludicrous and ridiculous. They moan about &#8216;not enough innovation&#8217;! What do they expect! What pills are these people taking!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321/comment-page-1#comment-990663</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31321#comment-990663</guid>
		<description>&quot;it would give future governments too much ammunition against pirates&quot;, 

And against innocent people wrongfully accused to be pirate who would be most of what they catch since the real pirates know how to avoid detection.

 The only way to make sure to never appear on the enemy radar screen would be to discontinue your IP provider subscription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it would give future governments too much ammunition against pirates&#8221;, </p>
<p>And against innocent people wrongfully accused to be pirate who would be most of what they catch since the real pirates know how to avoid detection.</p>
<p> The only way to make sure to never appear on the enemy radar screen would be to discontinue your IP provider subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321/comment-page-1#comment-990618</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31321#comment-990618</guid>
		<description>&quot;Theyâd mean he, or his Tory successor, another unelected official&quot; The &quot;Secretary of state for xxx&quot; can be any member of Parliament. That means it can be a member of the house of Lords, like Mandy, who is unelected, or can be a member of the house of Commons, who is. He has two positions, an honourific of &quot;First Secretary of State&quot;, which has no actual power, but his actual job is &quot;Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills&quot; which is where this proposal comes from.

Andrew
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Theyâd mean he, or his Tory successor, another unelected official&#8221; The &#8220;Secretary of state for xxx&#8221; can be any member of Parliament. That means it can be a member of the house of Lords, like Mandy, who is unelected, or can be a member of the house of Commons, who is. He has two positions, an honourific of &#8220;First Secretary of State&#8221;, which has no actual power, but his actual job is &#8220;Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills&#8221; which is where this proposal comes from.</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321/comment-page-1#comment-990605</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31321#comment-990605</guid>
		<description>&quot;change copyright law to combat file sharing&quot;?

I think they mean &#039;changing copyright law to combat copyright infringement&#039;.

The easiest way of doing that is to abolish copyright, not to criminalise citizens who fail to respect the corporation&#039;s privilege over them.

There are various approaches to abolishing copyright:
1) Enact such draconian enforcement that you foment a rebellion.
2) Provide a more lucrative alternative.
3) Help people understand why the privilege of a reproduction monopoly is unethical and should be abolished.

The corporations are doing an excellent job on the first approach, however it&#039;s a rather inhumane one, and their objective is to obtain control of the Internet (not simply to prevent &#039;counterfeiting&#039; or file-sharing).

I and others are working on the second, more humane approach, developing revenue mechanisms that operate without copyright. However, it&#039;s not easy homesteading an alien and unpopulated territory that most people believe to be an inhospitable wilderness existing beyond the edge of the world (as Jon appreciates only too well).

Not many are engaged in the third approach. QuestionCopyright.org and AgainstMonopoly.org are a couple that spring to mind. Perversely, the Pirate Party still supports copyright, but if the corporations keep it up (via ACTA, etc.) then even the Pirate Party might realise that principle should come before popularity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;change copyright law to combat file sharing&#8221;?</p>
<p>I think they mean &#8216;changing copyright law to combat copyright infringement&#8217;.</p>
<p>The easiest way of doing that is to abolish copyright, not to criminalise citizens who fail to respect the corporation&#8217;s privilege over them.</p>
<p>There are various approaches to abolishing copyright:<br />
1) Enact such draconian enforcement that you foment a rebellion.<br />
2) Provide a more lucrative alternative.<br />
3) Help people understand why the privilege of a reproduction monopoly is unethical and should be abolished.</p>
<p>The corporations are doing an excellent job on the first approach, however it&#8217;s a rather inhumane one, and their objective is to obtain control of the Internet (not simply to prevent &#8216;counterfeiting&#8217; or file-sharing).</p>
<p>I and others are working on the second, more humane approach, developing revenue mechanisms that operate without copyright. However, it&#8217;s not easy homesteading an alien and unpopulated territory that most people believe to be an inhospitable wilderness existing beyond the edge of the world (as Jon appreciates only too well).</p>
<p>Not many are engaged in the third approach. QuestionCopyright.org and AgainstMonopoly.org are a couple that spring to mind. Perversely, the Pirate Party still supports copyright, but if the corporations keep it up (via ACTA, etc.) then even the Pirate Party might realise that principle should come before popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321/comment-page-1#comment-990604</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31321#comment-990604</guid>
		<description>^^ Fixed. Thanks.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^ Fixed. Thanks.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neptune</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31321/comment-page-1#comment-990601</link>
		<dc:creator>Neptune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31321#comment-990601</guid>
		<description>Link to the Times article is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link to the Times article is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


