Comments on: Re-copyrighting remastered albums http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31327 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: EPiPH0N3 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31327/comment-page-1#comment-990575 EPiPH0N3 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:10:28 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31327#comment-990575 Oh so this is why we have been getting remaster after remaster after remaster...makes sense now but then again....... "When I'm movin' throuhg ma city I don't stop for tha flashin' lights" Oh so this is why we have been getting remaster after remaster after remaster…makes sense now but then again…….

“When I’m movin’ throuhg ma city I don’t stop for tha flashin’ lights”

]]> By: EE http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31327/comment-page-1#comment-990574 EE Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:08:39 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31327#comment-990574 So can I "remaster" movies by changing some hues slightly and share them? Can I "remaster" a book by printing it on an innovative new paper? Can I "remaster" another persons scholarly paper by changing the font and claiming it as my own? Luckily, the Supreme court is very difficult to corrupt, so there is virtually no way this will stand..... but part of me hopes that it does so I can start remastering things. So can I “remaster” movies by changing some hues slightly and share them?

Can I “remaster” a book by printing it on an innovative new paper?

Can I “remaster” another persons scholarly paper by changing the font and claiming it as my own?

Luckily, the Supreme court is very difficult to corrupt, so there is virtually no way this will stand….. but part of me hopes that it does so I can start remastering things.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31327/comment-page-1#comment-990496 Reader's Write Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:47:28 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31327#comment-990496 If labels get the new copyrights on remasters, the public can now remaster their CDs and share them. If the labels are denied copyrights on remasters, the works go back to artists. Nice gambit.... unless you factor in corruption. If labels get the new copyrights on remasters, the public can now remaster their CDs and share them.

If the labels are denied copyrights on remasters, the works go back to artists.

Nice gambit…. unless you factor in corruption.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31327/comment-page-1#comment-990480 Reader's Write Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:23:16 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31327#comment-990480 "But, if that’s the case, then the record labels own attempts to get new copyrights on remastered albums to avoid the termination rights might also be in jeopardy." No because the corporation of parasites do not give a shit about the law and they will continue to corrupt judges, cops, juries, government officials to continue their criminal dead. It does not matter though because some people do not give a shit about the law ever and are ready to spray these parasites with pest killers. “But, if that’s the case, then the record labels own attempts to get new copyrights on remastered albums to avoid the termination rights might also be in jeopardy.”

No because the corporation of parasites do not give a shit about the law and they will continue to corrupt judges, cops, juries, government officials to continue their criminal dead.

It does not matter though because some people do not give a shit about the law ever and are ready to spray these parasites with pest killers.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31327/comment-page-1#comment-990468 Reader's Write Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:20:25 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31327#comment-990468 See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Leonardo_self.jpg : "The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that claims to the contrary represent an assault on the very concept of a public domain". There is no creative work in remastering a sound recording, so are these newly filed copyrights really valid? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Leonardo_self.jpg : “The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that “faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that claims to the contrary represent an assault on the very concept of a public domain”. There is no creative work in remastering a sound recording, so are these newly filed copyrights really valid?

]]> By: David/ddbann http://www.p2pnet.net/story/31327/comment-page-1#comment-990460 David/ddbann Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:33:19 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=31327#comment-990460 Information brought to light can be revealing as you progreesively understand complex and fractured issues. Information brought to light can be revealing as you progreesively understand complex and fractured issues.

]]>