Comments on: Mandatory child porn reporting law

By: James Preston

James Preston — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:46:26 +0000

The biggest problem we are facing now as parents and concerned citizens trying to protect our children from pornography are the many “Tube” sites on the internet. These sites allow children to become members of the sites without any form of authentication and do not require proof of age to join, all while delivering various kinds of questionable content including child pornography and incest videos. One of the largest offenders of these “Tube” sites is http://www.xhamster.com. This site allows a child instant access to materials that are illegal for minors, allows them to post their own photos and videos, thus exploiting the children further, and encourages sexual encounters and promiscuous behavior. All this while not requiring any form of Adult Verification or Proof of Age of the user. These types of sites all post copyright infringing adult materials by their users requiring no proof of ownership of said materials. These sites must be stopped. If Adults of Questionable character like to visit these vulgar sites, that it is their prerogative, but a child must never be exposed to such material so easily and quickly. It is vital that if you read this post, that you share this information with other concerned citizens and organizations that might be able to do something about this completely overlooked crime against children. Act NOW!

By: Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew)

Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew) — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:12:15 +0000

Live for the Children, because they are our future

Not that anyone told me that when I was younger ):

By: Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew)

Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew) — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:37:51 +0000

I know this is a serious issue, but I have to say Pedobear is not Impressed. :p

Bill C-58 cannot be enacted on Google, Hotmail or Facebook because they are on US Soil, and would make ‘Canadas Project Cleanfeed’ somewhat ineffective altogether (Sorry Justice, Nicholson ): )

Im a kid myself at a mature age of 19 (somewhat) and I have like hundreds, and hundreds of friends that say I look underage (also known as “Jailbait”–The term used for People under the age of 18 who pose 18 to lure Perverts to teh Jail)

Child Pornography, or CP or what have you is a kind of Gray area I think.

According to http://ageofconsent.com in Canada is 14, In the State of Victoria, Australia, 17 as low as 12 in Chile, with Differing between 16-18 across the US

With an alarming amount of countries even BANNING underage same-sex which is sad I believe, and homophobic even to legal-age adults, (We are the Government-and We will choose who you have sex with?—thats not right even if you are underage)

Im not saying Child Porn is good, but I think the real people who hurt Children are Child Abusers, Assaulters, and Grown men (Who sadly, should know better) that smack Children for even the smallest of faults (There is no link to CP there these are Grown Adults who Call themselves Parents?)

Child Porn is petty and dare I say somewhat insignificant to the pain that Children feel each day that are assaulted by their parents, and smacked for spilling milk or drawing on the wall, yet Kids are Strong and Its taught naturally to them not to hold a grudge

Bi-Sexual, Lesbian, and Gay People have rights even if they are below 18 If a teen couple of the same age want to have (responsible) sex than it is the Government who are homophobic, Child Porn is abhorrent but homophobia is just childish (pardon the pun)

Why punish a few Perverts? Child Porn hurts no-one I believe an update to the Canadian Children and Family Services act, such as tougher penalties for smacking your Children (There are humane ways of discipling Children—-and its not letting your children associate you with violence)

Even Canadas Children Rights Council could get on this.

Im not saying Child Porn is not the root of all evil, in some men but Its even more disturbing to see Governments use it to hide their homophobia.

I always tend to Open a Pandoras Box.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:42:09 +0000

Ruining others’ lives just got easier.

Law should have been more draconian, so that it is easier to jail its authors.

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:22:04 +0000

“and they are prohibited from disclosing the disclosure to the customer.”

Gee that sounds like a Bill you can trust!

So if someone is innocent, I guess they can sue for $5 million + as they will have to run and hide to avoid the ignorant public rage.

By: Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew)

Comeoncomcast (aka Andrew) — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:36:39 +0000

Oh, dear