<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft sues COA pirates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3166/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3166</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3166/comment-page-1#comment-7899</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7899</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know whether it is legal for a company, based in the UK, to sell genuine COA stickers (only), without a CD or EULA?

The reason I ask is that I have been made aware that some companies within the UK, having received Microsoft &#039;cease and desist&#039; letters for selling this product, are now being &#039;threatened&#039; with litigation for continuing to sell this product.

Microsoft are apparently claiming that the seller is infringing their TradeMark and Copyright.

Does this mean that there is no LEGAL second-hand market in this product within the UK?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know whether it is legal for a company, based in the UK, to sell genuine COA stickers (only), without a CD or EULA?</p>
<p>The reason I ask is that I have been made aware that some companies within the UK, having received Microsoft &#8216;cease and desist&#8217; letters for selling this product, are now being &#8216;threatened&#8217; with litigation for continuing to sell this product.</p>
<p>Microsoft are apparently claiming that the seller is infringing their TradeMark and Copyright.</p>
<p>Does this mean that there is no LEGAL second-hand market in this product within the UK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3166/comment-page-1#comment-7428</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7428</guid>
		<description>&quot;Such companies unfairly compete in the marketplace with the thousands of legitimate Microsoft partners that deliver honest value to their customers.&quot;

Aha! very funny.
So those breaking M$ imposed monopoly &quot;unfairly compete in the marketplace&quot;?

What about M$ being paid for allowing &quot;partners&quot; exclusive right to participate in it&#039;s little monopoly?
Would that perhaps be a way to &quot;unfairly compete in the marketplace&quot; as well?
Aren&#039;t monopolies illegal anyway?

Kind of like the pot calling the kettle black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Such companies unfairly compete in the marketplace with the thousands of legitimate Microsoft partners that deliver honest value to their customers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Aha! very funny.<br />
So those breaking M$ imposed monopoly &#8220;unfairly compete in the marketplace&#8221;?</p>
<p>What about M$ being paid for allowing &#8220;partners&#8221; exclusive right to participate in it&#8217;s little monopoly?<br />
Would that perhaps be a way to &#8220;unfairly compete in the marketplace&#8221; as well?<br />
Aren&#8217;t monopolies illegal anyway?</p>
<p>Kind of like the pot calling the kettle black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3166/comment-page-1#comment-7418</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 03:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7418</guid>
		<description>I worked for a company that installed MS Windows in a not-by-the-book-way on all its computers. It&#039;s a lot easier to install the OS on one computer and then image it on multiple computers on the network. Doing it this way, IT had a lot of spare (unopened) CDs that were left lying around. (Maybe they didn&#039;t know about the volume license)

They could have sold them, and they would have been genuine licensed copies, though illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked for a company that installed MS Windows in a not-by-the-book-way on all its computers. It&#8217;s a lot easier to install the OS on one computer and then image it on multiple computers on the network. Doing it this way, IT had a lot of spare (unopened) CDs that were left lying around. (Maybe they didn&#8217;t know about the volume license)</p>
<p>They could have sold them, and they would have been genuine licensed copies, though illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3166/comment-page-1#comment-7410</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7410</guid>
		<description>&quot;Microsoft partners that deliver honest value to their customers.â

The words &quot;Microsoft&quot; and &quot;honest value&quot; should never be used in the same sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microsoft partners that deliver honest value to their customers.â</p>
<p>The words &#8220;Microsoft&#8221; and &#8220;honest value&#8221; should never be used in the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


