Ahhhhhhhh. Singles. :)
p2pnet news view | P2P | Music:- In the good old bad old days, 45s were where it was at, and I still have a bunch of them stashed away somewhere.
Ahhhh. Singles. 
“We need a selection of sites featuring music from indie musicians, and established artists such as Billy who own their own material and who can therefore do whatever they want with it, “I posted in p2pnet a couple of days back, going on:
” Sell individual downloads — singles, in other words — for 15 or 20 cents per, or perhaps by size as did AlloMP3,”
“What’s better, 20 people at 20 cents, or 1 person at $1? And include MP3s as well as regular tracks on CDs so people can easily transfer them to their music players.”
The names of Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music’s BPI and IFPI say it all.
BPI is short for British Phonographic Industry, and IFPI is International Federation of Phonographic Industry.
Phonographic Industry? “In American English, phonograph was the most common generic term for any early sound reproducing machine, until the second half of the 20th century, when it became archaic,” says the Wikipedia.
And ‘archaic’ tidely sums up Big 4 and their approach to music in the digital 21st century.
According to a Times Online, singles are staging a comeback with the BPI declaring 2009 “a record-breaking year” with “117.6 million sold to date”.
A comeback? In the virtually non-existent world of online corporate sales, maybe. However, they’ve never been away in the real world of online music, where caring is sharing, an vice versa.
Then the BPI admits “98.6 percent of all singles are now retailed in download format”.
So, “Do these huge sales figures mean that all the talk of piracy destroying music was merely self-interested whining from an industry fiercely defending its own interests?” – the story asks.
Of course, although not according to the BPI’s Adam Liversage.
“We’re still very worried about piracy,” he’s quoted as saying. “You have to set the number of sales against the fact there will be a billion illegal downloads in the UK this year, costing £200 million, money that would have been put back into developing new artists.”
Oh, really? If the figure was true, which it isn’t, the money would have gone straight back into the pockets of Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music.
Meanwhile, the assertion that one or one billion downloads means the loss of one or one billion sales is as ridiculous now as when it was first mooted in 2003, the year the labels launched their bizarre sue em all campaign against their own custmers.
The story rattles on as though there’s a viable corporate online music business. One of these days there may be. But not for a while. Not as long as the Big 4 persist in calling music fans criminals and thieves.
Until then, online it’ll be no business as usual – not corporate business, anyway.
Jon Newton – p2pnet
If p2pnet has value for you, help me keep it online. Cheers! And thanks : )
(If you don`t fancy online payments, please email me at p2pnet @ shaw dot ca and I`ll send you my snail-mail address.)
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi
p2pnet – The `loyal guardian of musicians`, November 25, 2009
Times Online – The single is born again thanks to music downloading, November 27, 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
November 30th, 2009 at 10:04 am
A billion downloads does not equal £200 million… If the average track price is £0.79 then a billion downloads is £790 million!
Aside from that though, piracy costs the industry £0 – we have not taken money from them – they have failed to earn it!!!
On another note, there are more services being launched and advertised in the UK, however they are hideously expensive – take the Sky Songs service – stream all you want, and you can download 15 tracks for £7.99 per month.. That is roughly the price of a plastic shiny disc with a similar number of tracks on it. It is too expensive – and offers no benefits over piracy! The only way I would subscribe to such a service is if it offered unlimited downloads (and I might pay a little extra for that – maybe £10 per month!).
November 30th, 2009 at 12:50 pm
At this point and time I’m so sick of the RIAA’s bullshit, IE: lawsuits, pushing for three strikes, pushing for an “endless pork” ISP tax/levy, super secret (we could tell you, but we’d have to kill you) ACTA world wide copyright treaties, I wouldn’t sign up for ANYTHING that would give even a dime of my money to those pigs.
November 30th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
” but not for a while. Not as long as the Big 4 persist in calling music fans criminals and thieves. ”
Certain artists parroting the same crap doesn’t help either.