Comments on: Wal-Mart sued over ‘f’ word

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:03:52 +0000

They act as if children (in this case its really teenagers) hearing the word fuck will give them aides or something.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 17 Dec 2004 04:20:44 +0000

This is what is wrong with the world today. WAL-MART DID NOT MAKE THESE PARENTS BUY THIS. ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS. YOU ONLY WANT MONEY!!!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:41:27 +0000

world = USA

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:23:06 +0000

fuck fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 12 Dec 2004 09:15:10 +0000

If your subject is empty, there is nothing to click on in order to see the comment!

Someone should probably append a to subjects when showing them, so there is something to be clicked on in case of no subject.
Either that or to provide a default non-empty subject when the subject is empty.

Following is the text of the previous comment.

“They’re also asking for up to $74,500 for each class member, people who bought the CD in Maryland.”

$74,500 per f-word. Should have bought an Eminem CD; you’d all be millionaires!”

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:34:16 +0000

but the world is NOT forced to eat macdonalds; the responsibility is in the hands of customers who buys products.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 12 Dec 2004 03:14:01 +0000

god how pathetic with all the shit that is on tv and in films now kids get exposed from very young, big deal on f word! just getting rich thru compensation culture

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 12 Dec 2004 01:13:02 +0000

“They’re also asking for up to $74,500 for each class member, people who bought the CD in Maryland.”

$74,500 per f-word. Should have bought an Eminem CD; you’d all be millionaires!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:49:31 +0000

but macdonalds IS responsible for the world being fat

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:11:21 +0000

This is just history repeating itself, over and over again.
Its not a federal law to have a parental advisory label, aka “The Tipper Sticker” on a cd at all, and especially not over 1 swear word would it constitute the label. Placing the label is a record label decision to comply with wishes of retailers and the likes of the RIAA. If this were a law, labels like Panzerfaust and Resistance Records would be in prison right now (These labels carry cds by anti-minority groups like Angry Aryans and Hatemonger and dont have any labelling system)

Point #2 is that it seems like every few months, someone has to try to sue wal-mart for everything out there. If her parents were so conservative they wouldnt have let her have the cd in the first place. Its just another classroom case of show and tell.

And #3 is that even though wal-mart doesn’t carry records with parental advisory labels, they do in fact sell R-Rated movies, Shotguns, Bullets, and other things that directly kill people including anything manufactured that mentions Rosie O’Donnell’s name.

Claiming any retailer is responsible for a record label decision is like blaming McDonalds for the world being so fat. Its up to people themselves to take care of things, not the messenger.

-MP

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:07:47 +0000

Frivilous