<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US: world&#8217;s worst spammer</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8138</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8138</guid>
		<description>It always seems to us out there not in the US that America is very good at telling people what to do with their pollution yet in fact is the worst polluter in many areas.

I really dunno what the problem is with Spam, to be honest and reading the "let's play god" comments above, people should remember who pays for the internet, ISP's are paid to host your signal nothing more, industry is what supports the Internet and I think that a way round would be is to licence advertisers in the same way people can buy a domain, too many complaints, lose the licence and ability to send emails en masse.

It wouldnt take much to work up a plugin for the email clients and it would make peoples live easir if they can choose to turn off unlicensed emails that are not considered personal or official.

Takes the pain and crime out of it all and leaves the spammers to spam themselves as no-one else will read it

AO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always seems to us out there not in the US that America is very good at telling people what to do with their pollution yet in fact is the worst polluter in many areas.</p>
<p>I really dunno what the problem is with Spam, to be honest and reading the &#8220;let&#8217;s play god&#8221; comments above, people should remember who pays for the internet, ISP&#8217;s are paid to host your signal nothing more, industry is what supports the Internet and I think that a way round would be is to licence advertisers in the same way people can buy a domain, too many complaints, lose the licence and ability to send emails en masse.</p>
<p>It wouldnt take much to work up a plugin for the email clients and it would make peoples live easir if they can choose to turn off unlicensed emails that are not considered personal or official.</p>
<p>Takes the pain and crime out of it all and leaves the spammers to spam themselves as no-one else will read it</p>
<p>AO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8086</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8086</guid>
		<description>So you say that when a bully comes up to you and starts punching you, all you should do is put your arms over your body to block the blows?  This is exactly what is happening when a spammer decides to take a crap in your inbox.  Once a server or filter processes the spam, the damage is already done.  Your computer or the ISP you used had to devote bandwidth and cpu cycles to deal with the spam.  

   I'm not about causing spammers' computers to be destroyed. If I wanted to knock out spammer's networks, there would be no spam networks.   I'm only about giving them a tast of their own crap.  In all fairness, I believe that Virgina's Spam law is unconstitutional.  9 years in prison for sending spam is excessive punishment.  Crapping on a spammer's website is fair game though. 

   By the way, if the RIAA came up with a method to destroy computers and used it against me,  I would make sure the RIAA's computers got the same treatment.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you say that when a bully comes up to you and starts punching you, all you should do is put your arms over your body to block the blows?  This is exactly what is happening when a spammer decides to take a crap in your inbox.  Once a server or filter processes the spam, the damage is already done.  Your computer or the ISP you used had to devote bandwidth and cpu cycles to deal with the spam.  </p>
<p>   I&#8217;m not about causing spammers&#8217; computers to be destroyed. If I wanted to knock out spammer&#8217;s networks, there would be no spam networks.   I&#8217;m only about giving them a tast of their own crap.  In all fairness, I believe that Virgina&#8217;s Spam law is unconstitutional.  9 years in prison for sending spam is excessive punishment.  Crapping on a spammer&#8217;s website is fair game though. </p>
<p>   By the way, if the RIAA came up with a method to destroy computers and used it against me,  I would make sure the RIAA&#8217;s computers got the same treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8076</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 06:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8076</guid>
		<description>no. Make better spam filters.

I'm with you in that i receive a lot of spam, but that is no less dirty an idea than the RIAA's pet bill which would have allowed them to remotely destroy your computer if they received evidence you were downloading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no. Make better spam filters.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you in that i receive a lot of spam, but that is no less dirty an idea than the RIAA&#8217;s pet bill which would have allowed them to remotely destroy your computer if they received evidence you were downloading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8071</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 02:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3395#comment-8071</guid>
		<description>I say it is time to attack sites that are advertised by spam.  However, it is important to actually check the site out before attacking to make sure that the site is not being framed by spammers (Joe Jobbed).  Once you see that the site looks spammy, then let 'em have it.  Misleading addresses, phone numbers and such will provide many headaches for those in the spam business.  I routinely put my phone number into inquiry forms on spamvertised sites.  I then have fun with the company who calls me.  Once I have had my fill of fun, i tell the caller that they got their lead from a spammer and that I will never do business witht heir company.  I also ask to speak with the caller's supervisor and thank them for allowing me to waste their company's time and money.
http://www.plaza1.net/spammerslammer.cgi
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say it is time to attack sites that are advertised by spam.  However, it is important to actually check the site out before attacking to make sure that the site is not being framed by spammers (Joe Jobbed).  Once you see that the site looks spammy, then let &#8216;em have it.  Misleading addresses, phone numbers and such will provide many headaches for those in the spam business.  I routinely put my phone number into inquiry forms on spamvertised sites.  I then have fun with the company who calls me.  Once I have had my fill of fun, i tell the caller that they got their lead from a spammer and that I will never do business witht heir company.  I also ask to speak with the caller&#8217;s supervisor and thank them for allowing me to waste their company&#8217;s time and money.<br />
<a href="http://www.plaza1.net/spammerslammer.cgi" rel="nofollow">http://www.plaza1.net/spammerslammer.cgi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
