Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

RIAA wants more time with Jammie and Joel

p2pnet view P2P | RIAA:- There seems to be a bit of confusion in RIAA-land these days, says Recording Industry vs The People’s Ray Beckerman.

There is? Now, what could have caused it?

Well, despite having aimed thousands of sue ‘em all notices at innocent American families the length and breadth of the country, only  two cases have actually born fruit.

And they’ve both become huge embarrassments for the Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music extortion unit.

One centres on Jammie Thomas-Rasset, initially ordered to pay almost two million dollars to cover 24 digital music files she was alleged to have downloaded. However, Michael Davis, the judge who’d heard the case from the beginning, ultimately drastically reduced that amount to $54,000.

The labels themselves and then offered to cut it back even further, asking for $25,000.

However, Jammie is standing on her principles, refusing to pay.

And in the other case Boston student Joel Tenenbaum, told to find $675,000 for supposedly sharing 30 songs online, is asking for a new trial.

Now, “In both cases, the RIAA has recently asked for extensions of time,” says Beckerman, going on:

“In Thomas-Rasset they’ve asked for more time to make up their mind as to whether to accept the reduced verdict of $54,000 the judge has offered them, and in Tenenbaum they’ve twice asked for more time to prepare their papers opposing Tenenbaum’s motion for ‘remittitur’.”

Once, it was easy for the RIAA.

All they had to do was to get someone like the RIAA’s most (in)famous spokesman Cary ‘Sue’ Sherman to allege some innocent person — usually a mother with absolutely no ability to pay for an adequate legal defence –  was a ‘massive illegal distributor’ of copyrighted music, and the mainstream media did the rest, publicly dragging the victim through the mud on behalf of Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music.

Not any more, however.

SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum second RIAA request for extension of time to answer remittitur motion

Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset RIAA request for extension of time in which to make up its mind about accepting or challenging reduced verdict

Stay tuned.

Follow p2pnet on Twitter

..… and identi.ca

1p Subscribe

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

Recording Industry vs The People – RIAA asks for extensions of time in Tenenbaum & in Thomas-Rasset cases, January 28, 2010
refusing to pay
– ‘We’ll settle for $25,000′ RIAA tells Jammie, January 27, 2010
new trial
– DoJ opposes Tenenbaum bid for new trial, January 20, 2010


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/feed


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

3 Responses to “RIAA wants more time with Jammie and Joel”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Fuck them. Reap what you sow ‘AAs! No surrender until the constitutional issues are resolved once and for all.

  2. kcb19892000 Says:

    Let’s hope these corporate pigs land from the frying pan into the actual fire. Turn them into bacon!

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    Just pay these parasites with bullets.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy