Comments on: Content and Control http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3491 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:45:22 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Karan http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3491/comment-page-1#comment-429879 Karan Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:31:43 +0000 #comment-429879 I love your site. I found your blog via Google while searching for best exchange rates uk and your post regarding Content and Control looks very interesting to me. It really looks very nice. The articles provided are long enough to provide great content but not so long as to be totally engrossing, if you know what I mean. I love your site. I found your blog via Google while searching for best exchange rates uk and your post regarding Content and Control looks very interesting to me. It really looks very nice. The articles provided are long enough to provide great content but not so long as to be totally engrossing, if you know what I mean.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3491/comment-page-1#comment-8383 Reader's Write Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:37:04 +0000 #comment-8383 "Insulating the traditional business model would require re-imposing greater control on content and consumer behavior despite potentially liberating digital technologies, which, as discussed, would incur significant social costs." --And violate the constitution, as is ALREADY in progress or on the drawing board. (first, fourth, fifth, fourteenth amendments among others) "A less aggressive policy approach in support of this model is simply to refuse to skew the balance of consumer rights and industry control in favor of the industries’ piracy-fighting arsenal, thus adding to the industries’ incentive to support (or acquiesce in) the emergence of a CBL. For instance, the DMCA’s anticircumvention provisions could be repealed, and secondary liability for P2P could be eased. Should either or both industries choose to organize in this fashion, the government could play an enabling role at that time.85" excellent recommendations... “Insulating the traditional business model would require re-imposing greater control on content and consumer behavior despite potentially liberating digital technologies, which, as discussed, would incur significant social costs.”

–And violate the constitution, as is ALREADY in progress or on the drawing board. (first, fourth, fifth, fourteenth amendments among others)

“A less aggressive policy approach in support of this model is simply to refuse to skew the balance of consumer rights and industry control in favor of the industries’ piracy-fighting arsenal, thus adding to the industries’ incentive to support (or acquiesce in) the emergence of a CBL. For instance, the DMCA’s anticircumvention provisions could be repealed, and secondary liability for P2P could be eased. Should either or both industries choose to organize in this fashion, the government could play an enabling role at that time.85″

excellent recommendations…

]]>