Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

UK government as music agents

p2pnet view Music | Politic:- Contract problems will soon be a thing of the past for young musicians in the UK.

The British government is to about to take over the task of looking after their interests, they’ll be relieved to learn.

A new committee will be working with the likes of the discredited Featured Artists Coalition, the performers’ organisation which first came out strongly against the entertainment industry’s Three Strikes proposal to disconnect people said to have shared music with each other online,  only to completely reverse its position not long after.

“The Intellectual Property Office is following up on its promise to clarify and clean up contracts between artists and record companies by appointing a team to ‘ensure artists don’t sign everything away when they are young’,” says MusicWeek, going on:

“Intellectual Property minister David Lammy, in collaboration with the Department for Business Innovation and Skills, made the promise to draw together a working party to develop model contracts or contract clauses that strike a fair balance between the rights of creators and publishers as one of its 32 “conclusions and actions” in last year’s report © the way ahead: A Strategy for Copyright in the Digital Age.”

The Department for Business Innovation, etc, is the fiefdom of Peter ‘Mandy’ Mandelson, the man chosen by Hollywood and Big music to represent their vested corporate interests in the UK.

He’s the principal face behind the Three Strikes bill under which the government, supported by UK taxpayers, would look after entertainment industry copyright concerns, and ISPs would act a copyright cops against their own customers, who’d be at risk of being thrown off the net on the say-so of Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music, and Disney, News Corp, Time Warner, Viacom, NBC Universal and Sony Pictures.

Now “a spokesman for the IPO says it is close to formulating the team and expects to approach publishers and groups such as the Featured Artists Coalition in order to progress work on the ‘muddled’ contracts before the end of March”, says MusicWeek, quoting the spokesman as stating:

“We want to ensure that artists when they sign young don’t lose out because some of these contracts – certainly in the fine print – are like entering a pact with the devil,” he says.

He “expects the work will involve a number of industry-related workshops”.

The story doesn’t say how many millions of pounds will be spent on sorting things out, what role the corporate cartels will play, who will decide precisely what comprises a “fair balance”, or what will be used to legitimise the now squeaky clean contracts.

And there’s not a word about the most important elements of all — the fans and voters, the people upon whom these diverse interests wholly depend.

Stay tuned.

Or not.

(Cheers, Paul)

Follow p2pnet on Twitter

..… and identi.ca

1p Subscribe

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win ~ Mahatma Gandhi

completely reverse its position – Dear Featured Artists’ Coalition …, December 28, 2009
MusicWeek
– Government to name team to clean up “muddled” contracts, February 3, 2010


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/feed


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

http://www.p2pnet.net/images/dico.jpg

HOME

One Response to “UK government as music agents”

  1. Crosbie Fitch Says:

    There was an pact or agreement between Queen Anne and the Stationer’s Guild in 1710 to suspend the public’s right to copy. That was very much like a pact between one devil and another. No public consultation.

    Three centuries later, there’s another pact on the table to be agreed multilaterally between various governments and various publishing corporations, i.e. the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement of 2010. The same devils are involved. The public are still excluded.

    Contracts with labels that result in artists selling the public’s suspended rights for unrecoupable advances are farcical in comparison.

    Artists would be far better off saying “To hell with copyright! To hell with record labels, collection societies and their cronies in government! I’m selling my music directly to my fans for what we both agree it’s worth, and everyone can keep the rights they were born with to do whatever they want; copy it, sing it, sell it, remix it, enjoy it!”

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy