<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FBI drops Carnivore spy tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3571/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3571</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:08:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3571/comment-page-1#comment-8740</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8740</guid>
		<description>Proverbs 28, verse 1:
 The wicked man flees though no one pursues, 
    but the righteous are as bold as a lion. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proverbs 28, verse 1:<br />
 The wicked man flees though no one pursues,<br />
    but the righteous are as bold as a lion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3571/comment-page-1#comment-8733</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8733</guid>
		<description>perhaps you do not understand..
the fbi monitors the lines.
they see what you do before you ever connect to a proxy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps you do not understand..<br />
the fbi monitors the lines.<br />
they see what you do before you ever connect to a proxy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3571/comment-page-1#comment-8722</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8722</guid>
		<description>What commercially available software are the Feds using instead? Given we have heard nothing about this until now, it appears the FBI has told certain entities to keep their mouths shut about who is buying their products. On the other hand, might those entities fear a consumer backlash for providing the Feds that software? In doing so, could there also be possible conflicts of interests? 

For example, would you want Symantec selling to consumers software designed to scan/update their systems, but at the same time using much of that same basic knowledge to assist the FBI in scanning their e-mail or hard drive contents? Would you then buy from Symantec not knowing just how much the government may have influenced their business decisions and products, what things their software should scan for and report, the exact nature of updates to which you have subscribed, or what data or files to overlook during system scans for some &quot;national security&quot; reason?

I, for one, would have very serious doubts about buying the products of any firm that had access to my computer (as their virus and malware software/updates have), and also worked directly with the government to assist in scanning consumers&#039; computers without their knowledge. I would love to see an expose of those firms providing this &quot;commercial software for online spying.&quot; I am willing to bet there might be a few surprises. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What commercially available software are the Feds using instead? Given we have heard nothing about this until now, it appears the FBI has told certain entities to keep their mouths shut about who is buying their products. On the other hand, might those entities fear a consumer backlash for providing the Feds that software? In doing so, could there also be possible conflicts of interests? </p>
<p>For example, would you want Symantec selling to consumers software designed to scan/update their systems, but at the same time using much of that same basic knowledge to assist the FBI in scanning their e-mail or hard drive contents? Would you then buy from Symantec not knowing just how much the government may have influenced their business decisions and products, what things their software should scan for and report, the exact nature of updates to which you have subscribed, or what data or files to overlook during system scans for some &#8220;national security&#8221; reason?</p>
<p>I, for one, would have very serious doubts about buying the products of any firm that had access to my computer (as their virus and malware software/updates have), and also worked directly with the government to assist in scanning consumers&#8217; computers without their knowledge. I would love to see an expose of those firms providing this &#8220;commercial software for online spying.&#8221; I am willing to bet there might be a few surprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/3571/comment-page-1#comment-8699</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8699</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to know which ISP&#039;s are providing the data to the FBI, which log files, what information each log file contains and what are the requirements for disclosure.  Maybe proxies will have to become the norm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know which ISP&#8217;s are providing the data to the FBI, which log files, what information each log file contains and what are the requirements for disclosure.  Maybe proxies will have to become the norm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
