Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

The mathematics of music

p2pnet.net News:- Back in November, 2003, we ran an item on Polyphonic HMI (Human Media Interface), kicking off with, “You know those flat, thin squares of rubbery, yellow cheese – the stuff they sell in supermarkets and that you find on fast-food cheeseburgers? It’s been ‘processed’ for easy handling, packaging and distribution and tastes as flat and thin as it looks.”

Spain’s Polyphonic HMI (Human Medcia Interface) was, “doing the same thing with HSS – market-babble for ‘Hit Song Science’,” a system of mathematical music analysis it’s using for “individual music recommendation” and, “as a tool for the record industry”.

Well, it seems the corporate music brigade have taken it seriously, as have some performers bent on becoming STARS !!! but who can’t wait for natural selection to do its thing

“Martin and Ruth, aka Spike, the next big girl/boy duo (so they hope) add some synth and a new background vocal to the mix,” says the Guardian Unlimited.

“He saves the song and she emails it to Polyphonic Human Media Interface who, within 24 hours, will tell them whether their song will be a hit. When the results arrive they hover over the 20in screen and click on the returned mail. There is a graph, showing a cluster of many dots, like a constellation, and somewhere in the cluster a red spot.

“The spot marks their song, not quite a bullseye, but still in the throng. “It’s scored a seven,” Ruth says, scanning down. “We’re in. The record company will definitely meet us now.” Their future suddenly looks a lot rosier.”

Yes. Well.

But given that the Big Music cartel is interested only in music that can be cookie-cuttered and then churned out by the billions as physical CDs so crooks can pirate them, that doesn’t come as a big surprise.

Quantity, not quality, counts.

While no one’s talking about it, “it seems that the whole record industry is already using just this process,” says the story.

“From unsigned acts dreaming in their garage, to multinationals such as Sony and Universal, everyone is clandestinely using a new and controversial technology to gain an edge on their competitors. And just as with athletes and performance-enhancing drugs, there is a remarkable reluctance to talk about it. But the secret is out: the record biz, once that bastion of wayward creative flair, is succumbing to the plain old-fashioned science of statistical analysis.”

With Jimena Llopis as executive chairman, Mike McCready as ceo and Tracie Reed as vp, North America, Polyphonic HMI says failed musicians “might still be enjoying careers in music” had they but used HSS.

“Had HSS existed in 1966 and had Decca used it to evaluate a certain demo that arrived they may not have turn down the Beatles, whose music sounded very risky for the times,” it states.

It also says, “Our customers are the music labels but the beneficiaries of our work include the people who create, perform and consume music. The more healthy the industry is the more opportnities [sic] there are for everyone who hopes to make a career in music.”

With Big Music as the Big Customer, it’s no surprise to learn HSS doesn’t come cheap – €4,000 (more than $5,200) to score a finished CD, as the Guardian points out.

For $49.99, HSS, will decide if an individual musician’s tune has, “hit potential based on the mathematical characteristics of the music”.

Now, “please note that we will not be able to offer our promotional price of $50 per song report for much longer,” says the company’s “website for unsigned artists”.

“So be sure to take advantage of this offer and upload your songs this year.”

Plenty of hopefuls have forked out thousands of dollars for demos, and now here’s a new way for them to spend their cash.

“Does it sound like a hit song?” and “Can we promote it effectively?” – asks the “website for unsigned artists,” continuing:

“Using those two criteria and research tools such as focus groups and call-out research the industry has about a 20% success rate. That is, only one in five songs that get promoted ever chart.

“By adding a third criteria to the mix … Does it have optimal mathematical patterns? … we’ve achieved a 100% success rate with our label and producer customers of our professional service.”

The company doesn’t define “100% success,” or say either how it relates to “our label and producer customers,” or who they are.

But, “The service offered on this site can help you determine if your music has some of the patterns needed to become a hit song and you can use our reports to gain the attention of A&R professionals.”

Does it work? Could be. To an extent, at any rate.

But it does take the music out of music and at the end of the day, if a song is worth listening to, it’ll be heard somehow or other, that being particularly so now the Net has made it possible for anyone, anywhere, to play their compositions to music lovers around the world.

Big Music is trying desperately to keep things the way they used to be. But it’s failing.

This is the digital 21st century and talent, not stats, will decide who rises to the top.

===================

See:-
flat, thin squares – Music and processed cheese, p2pnet, November 23, 2005
big girl/boy duoRIAA collapses INDUCE talks, p2pnet, October 8, 2004

HOME

4 Responses to “The mathematics of music”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    How condescending of them to market only based on cold hard numbers.

    As if the human mind can be quantized and predicted.

    They’re like the archetypal male sheuvenist using a calculated pattern to woo women.. and it is having exactly the same real effect… anyone with a modicum of grey matter between their ears is looking around and saying.. “why are all the radio stations the same?” and “I’m tired of this.. no more money for cd’s”

    the record company is getting what it deserves for this insulting presumption… a swift slap in the face.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    “Had HSS existed in 1966 and had Decca used it to evaluate a certain demo that arrived they may not have turn down the Beatles, whose music sounded very risky for the times,” it states.

    I think they’re right in at least one aspect of this statement. The Beatles would have done well because their music was the ultimate cookie cutter type pop
    of its day. Just look at the audiences in their concerts.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    The Beatles succeeded because they were fresh, exciting, brilliant, cute, and last but not least, expertly promoted.

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    1966 I think you mean 1962 or 63!!!! Great promotion for the Beatles?????? Remenber all that Beatle stuff companies were selling Lunch box’s /Bubble gum cards/ TV trays/wigs/Boots/ Dolls and all the other stuff?????? The Beatles made nothing or very little off of any of it!!! And this was one reason why they got to be so popular!!!!! Lot’s of Free Promotion!!!!! The Beatles are one of the Best(not pete) reasons for P2P file sharing!!!! Making nothing off your fame but only getting bigger from all that FREE Promotion and selling a sh*t load of records in the process!!!!!! The Riaa needs to look back at history and learn a lesson!!!! Sell a sh*t load of music from all that FREE promotion on P2P!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy